Innovation can be simply defined as a "new idea, creative thoughts, new imaginations in form of device or method". However, innovation is often also viewed as the application of better solutions that meet new requirements, unarticulated needs, or existing market needs. Such innovation takes place through the provision of more-effective products, processes, services, technologies, or business models that are made available to markets, governments and society. The term "innovation" can be defined as something original and more effective and, as a consequence, new, that "breaks into" the market or society. Innovations tend to be produced by outsiders and founders in startups, rather than existing organizations. Innovation is related to, but not the same as, invention, as innovation is more apt to involve the practical implementation of an invention (i.e. new/improved ability) to make a meaningful impact in the market or society, and not all innovations require an invention.
*^feel free to add on <3*^
Answer:
what is this mean
Explanation:
please you interpret into english plsssss
Answer:
Correct answers are:
A. Dictatorship of the Roman emperors
B. Inefficiency of the Roman soldiers
Explanation:
Option A is correct because Roman emperors were rather incompetent. Their region was harsh and people didn't like them in general. That made internal problems in the country.
Option B is also correct because through time Roman army lost its stability and discipline. Many mercenaries were part of it, and this led to its inefficiency.
Option C is not correct as new capital that was created on the east was the source of stability on the East. But, Western Empire had its own problems.
Answer:
The consequences of poverty affect everyone
Explanation:
Law enforcement, court officials and crime victims are affected because of the higher incidence of property crimes found in poor neighborhoods. ... Social workers are affected because their caseloads would be more manageable if the number of people living in poverty were reduced.
Explanation:
<em>In it, he developed a computational system for a partially heliocentric planetary model, in which the planets orbit the Sun, which in turn orbits the Earth. In the Tantrasangraha (1500), he revised the mathematics of his planetary system further and incorporated the Earth's rotation on its axis. The heliocentric model was generally rejected by the ancient philosophers for three main reasons: If the Earth is rotating about its axis, and orbiting around the Sun, then the Earth must be in motion. However, we cannot ``feel'' this motion. The celestial sphere was assumed to lie just beyond the orbit of Saturn. Copernicus had two main reasons for asserting that the Sun was the center of our solar system. Copernicus didn't like the fact that the Ptolemaic model had big epicycles to explain the retrograde motions of the planets. He knew that this could be explained instead by having the Earth also moving around the Sun. From his observations, Copernicus concluded that every planet, including Earth, revolved around the Sun. He also determined that the Earth rotates daily on its axis and that the Earth's motion affected what people saw in the heavens. Copernicus did not have the tools to prove his theories.</em>
<em />
<u><em>Hope this helps! </em></u>
