Answer:
d. helped spread Christianity to the East.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
a. monopolized the spice trade.
c. made ties with local rulers.
b. opened trade with China.
d. helped spread Christianity to the East.
Out of these options, the only action that cannot be linked to the Dutch East India Company is that of spreading Christianity to the East. The Dutch East India Company was a corporation that dominated trade in the East during the 17th century. The company was responsible for making ties with the Mughal government, as well as other Southeast Asian governments, in order to control trade in the area. Its trade consisted mainly of spices (with a 21-year monopoly), silks, ships, coffee, sugarcane and wine.
They had the Nile with them which was the best natural resource out there. The river would help them have great and fertile soil, which they could also irrigate and have an easy job developing agriculture.
Framers had their blind spots. I won’t mention slavery for the moment, since that’s where everyone goes and since that blot has been amended out of the Constitution (and since many of the Framers, notably Ben Franklin and Alexander Hamilton, were anti-slavery).
One of the big blind spots, which seriously interfered with their thinking on many constitutional matters, is that they believed it would be possible to have national politics without political parties. This played a big role in the creation of the Electoral College system. The strange tale of how the electoral system came about puts some of its weird features into context. Once you get this context, it is at least understandable what the Framers thought they were doing.
The correct answer is "<span>40 percent".
40 percent of students who graduate high school has tried marijuana, how? High School life is considered to be the period of an individual's life where they experience and try a lot of new things, because students are curious. Due to that curiosity they are brought to different experiences, mostly because of their peers as well.</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is D. Judges in a common law system have the power to interpret the common law so that it applies to the unique circumstances of an individual case.
Explanation:
The common law system is based, above all, on the analysis of judicial sentences handed down by the same court or one of its higher courts (those to which decisions made by said court can be appealed) and on the interpretations that in these sentences are given from the laws. This is why the laws can be ambiguous in many respects, as the courts are expected to clarify them (or they have already done so on previous, but similar, laws).
On the other hand, there are judicial interpretations that create new legal figures, which in the beginning was the norm, but today is the exception. However, the nomenclature that recognizes as a statutory offense, for example, the offense created by law, is maintained. At present, it is much more common for laws to create completely new figures or to standardize and set the rules previously established by court sentences.
A very important detail is that, in subsequent cases, the sufficient reason of the sentences previously handed down obliges a court (and all courts below this) to fail to the same way or similarly. This is why the study of the system is based on the detailed analysis of the sentences from which the norm is induced, a study that ends in the elaboration of a "typical case", which is compared with the situation under study to see if it is similar or not. On many occasions, several sentences containing the same principle, viewed from different perspectives, are analyzed to finally extract the rule that will be applied to the case under study.
