<span>Indus River provided a link to sea to trade with mesopotamia</span>
Answer:
pretty sure it was large, whether or not it was ill prepared to fight is up for debate. It's been a few years since I revised this, but I'm pretty sure that during the Schleiffen plan the German army relied on the Russians being too slow to defend themselves, however they were quicker than expected? due to this and the sheer size of the army itself I would say d, large and well prepared to fight. They were large enough that even if they were awful in combat they would still be a force to be reckoned with, as they could afford to supply men after men without running out, unlike the German army.
Explanation:
Charles I appointed Catholics as government officials and recruited them in the army.
<h3>Who is
Charles I?</h3>
Charles I was born on the 19th of November 1600 in Dunfermline Palace, Rosyth, United Kingdom. Also, he was chosen as the King of England, Scotland, and Ireland, where he ruled from the 27th of March, 1625 until his execution in 1649.
Based on historical information and records, Charles I (King of England) was known to have appointed Catholics as government officials and recruited them in the army.
Read more on Charles I here: brainly.com/question/894660
#SPJ1
I assume your talking about the HUNS... When the empire split in two the east had more gold and more resources and the dying west had to suffer all the barbarian attacks like the huns... The East quite simply was more prepared and had more walls and guards to defend their border also the Eastern Empire had the river danube north of them which helped deflect the Hunnic invasions and other barbarian invasion more west...
