Answer:
No
Explanation:
That's what I know so accept
Answer: the representation of states in Congress.
<em>The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise both focused on </em><em>the representation of states in Congress.</em>
Both of these compromises were devised during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787. The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery. For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures. (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.) The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.
In the election of 1800, Jefferson and Burr tied.
The main issue is that second place got VP, instead of a ticket running together. So, a President would not have the choice of VP.
<span>They went to shows like the Vaudeville show, they went to picture movies, they started watching and playing sports, they sent telegraphs to communicate with others, they shopped, read newspapers, went to amusement parks, Wild West shows, and went to concerts. We still do many of these activities today for our leisure time.</span>
If you ever saw the movie Apocalypto, also was apart of the Aztec Culture but as the Mayan, the priest would do the blood-letting and human sacrifice. The answer is B!
