Answer:
41
Step-by-step explanation:
If the shopkeeper needs 820 candles, and each packet has 20 candles, 820/20 = 41 packets.
The total surface area of the given pyramid is:
A = 39ft²
<h3>
How to get the surface area of the given figure?</h3>
The total surface area will be equal to the sum of the areas of the square and the 4 triangles.
Remember that for a square of side length S, the area is:
A = S².
In this case, S = 3ft, then:
A = (3ft)² = 9ft².
Now, the area of a triangle of base B and height H is:
A = B*H/2.
Here we can see that the triangles have a base of 3ft (the sides of the square) and a height of 5ft, then the area of each triangle is:
A = (3ft)*(5ft)/2 = 7.5 ft²
Then the total area of the figure is:
A = 4*(7.5 ft²) + 9ft² = 39ft²
If you want to learn more about pyramids:
brainly.com/question/10042135
#SPJ1
Answer:
x= 32 ± √29
Step-by-step explanation:
x² - 8x - 13 = 0
ax² + bx + c = 0
Comparing equations we get,
a=1
b=(-8)
c=(-13)
Using quadratic formula,
________
x= b² ± √ b²-4ac
—————————
2a
Substituting the values
__________
x= 64 ± √( 64 + 52)
______________
2
= 32 ± √29
Hope this answer helps you....
Answer:-7/4
Step-by-step explanation:
2(x-2)=6x+2-2(-2x-4)
Open brackets
2x-4=6x+2+4x+8
Collect like terms
-4-2-8=6x+4x-2x
-14=8x
Divide both sides by 8
-14/8=8x/8
-7/4=x
x=-7/4
Answer:
The statement is missing. The statement is -- "A ray can be part of a line."
The answer is : The converse is not true, so Jahmiah is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
A conditional statement is represented by showing p → q. It means if p is correct or true, then q is also correct or true.
And the converse of p → q can be shown as q → p.
But we know that the converse of a statement is not always true, it may be true and may not be true.
In the context, the statement is " a ray can be a part of a line." And so the converse would be "A line can be a part of the ray".
So by definition we know that a line is continuous line having no end points, it extends in one direction. While a ray starts from a point and extends to infinity in one direction.
Thus ray is part of line but line is not a part of the ray. So the converse of the statement is not correct.
Hence, Jahmiah is correct.
