I can tell you it is not less powerful than the executive. They are equal in power.
Europe kind of has two Governments, but first, America is a Republic, you go to court for stuff so you can be justified guilty or innocent. On the other hand, Europe is a monarchy, as well as its a presidential republic. I'm sorry if this isn't what you're looking for but this is what I know.
It's definitely not in a theocracy: those usually favour the majorities.
Also migrant labors don't specifically favour minorities.
Now, between democracies and command economies the choice is very hard, as it depends more on the specific country. So for example in many places the role of the minorities rose in command economies, since they went against the patriarchy (in China this was the case for example, the role of women in China improved drastically, while women and minorities are still struggling in Japan, which is a democracy). On the other hand, Nazi Germany was also a command economy, and yet it was very bad for minorities
I would say that the question is too complex to give just one answer, but I would also argue for option d)
Answer:
observational learning
Explanation:
Trevor observed someone being a shot in a television show, then learned that behavior from seeing it. It'd be the same as learning how to play a game by watching someone else do it, or learning about marine life through a nature documentary.
Well, I'd say it was Skinner because the rest didn't even research operant conditioning, they were only interested in classical one (which involved just association between 2 stimuli).
