Answer: B
Explanation: the alamo did.
Answer:
Roman historiography stretches back to at least the 3rd century BC and was indebted to earlier Greek historiography. The Romans relied on previous models in the Greek tradition such as the works of Herodotus and Thucydides. Roman historiographical forms are usually different from their Greek counterparts, however, and often emphasize Roman concerns. The Roman style of history was based on the way that the Annals of the Pontifex Maximus, or the Annales Maximi, were recorded. The Annales Maximi include a wide array of information, including religious documents, names of consuls, deaths of priests, and various disasters throughout history. Also part of the Annales Maximi are the White Tablets, or the "Tabulae Albatae", which consist of information on the origin of the Roman Republic.
Hellenic historiography involves efforts made by Greeks to track and record historical events. By the 5th century BC, it became an integral part of ancient Greek literature and held a prestigious place in later Roman historiography and Byzantine literature.
My arguments for the case is me being on the side of brown because I love the color brown.
Answer:
They always relay accurate information about an event
Explanation:
Because, eyewitness accounts means that it is a description given by someone who was present at a certain event which, makes the information they relay accurate since they were the ones that witnessed the event making it important in History.
This is only what I think that may be the answer. Hope this helps :)
