Answer:
1. Positive Externality ; 2. Negative Externality ; 3. Positive Externality.
Explanation:
Externalities are benefits or harms to other parties , without payment received or made for them respectively.
Positive Externalities : Externalities positively effecting others. Eg-Education
Negative Externalities : Externalities positively effecting others . Eg-Pollution.
1. Bridal Shop's signage facelift creates benefit for other strip mall businesses also (better business visibility), without former receiving money & latter paying money.
2. Local church celebration creates benefit for all attendants (recreational benefit) ,without former receiving money & latter paying money.
3. Local School bus ramp construction creates harm for commuters of that area (traffic inconvenience) , without former paying money & latter receiving money
The answer is 7 players.
If, the amount of red cards that received by either team make the total players of their team less than 7, the opposition team would automatically won the game (and the vicotry would be recorded as 3-0 victory for the team that still had more than 7 players)
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
a. Sales = $27000
Less: sales returned = -$660
Less: discount at 2% = ($27000 - $660) × 2% = -$526.8
Net sales = $25813.2
b. Net sales = $25813.2
Less: cost of goods sold = $15000 - $400 = -$14600
Gross profit = $11213.2
Operating expense:
Less: Selling and administrative expenses = -$2835
Operating income = $8378.2
Non-operating items:
Less: Interest expense = ($200
Add: Gain on land Sales = $900
Net Income= $9078.2
c. The interest expense be shown on the statement of cash flows in the operating expenses section. It'll be recorded in the operating activities.
d. The sale of the land would be under the investing activity as it's capital asset of the business. Therefore, the full sales price of the land, $9,250, would be shown as a cash inflow from investing activities on the statement of cash flows.
Option B is the correct answer.
Answer:
Explanation:
We were informed from the question that;
BEFORE; the tax, 30,000 bottles of wine were sold every week at a price of $4 per bottle.
AFTER; After the tax, 25,000 bottles of wine are sold every week; consumers pay $6 per bottle and producers receive $3 per bottle (after paying the tax).
✓✓The amount of tax on wine = $6 - $3 = $3 per bottle
✓✓The tax burden on consumers = The amount paid after tax - The amount paid before tax
= $6 - $4
=$2 per bottle
✓✓The tax burden on Producers = Price received before tax - price received after tax
= $4 - $3
=$1 per bottle
Hence, The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $3 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $2 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $1 per bottle.
The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been smaller if the tax had been levied on consumers(FALSE)
This is false, since the The tax burden on Producers is $1 per bottle while that of The tax burden on consumer is $2 per bottle.
Answer:
c. protect lessees against lessors who abuse leased assets.
Explanation:
The residual value guarantee may be defined as a guarantee that is made to the lessor where the value of an underlying asset will become at least some specified amount at the end of the lease. The guarantee is given by the party unrelated to a lessor.
The residual value guarantee provides to protect the lessor against the lessees who tries to abuse the leased assets. It does not protect the lessees against the lessors.
