The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I am going to explore the environmental issues/attitudes that I see in the media, taking the case of the film "An Inconvenient Truth," produced by former Democratic candidate to the presidency of the United States, Al Gore.
The film, released in 2006, tries to create conscience about the difficult topic of the damage that humans are inflicting on the environment and how mother Earth tends to react when so much noise, air, and water pollution abounds on the planet. The central topic is global warming, and the film presents testimonials and statistics about the increasing pollution levels in most parts of the earth and the damage industries and means of transportation causes the planet due to carbon dioxide.
Other pieces of literature support these concerns, meanwhile, the Bible warned of the kind of destruction that was created in the past if we sin and do not respect nature as a creation of God.
B. eloquently
After writing for many hours, the journalist felt he had written an important piece that would improve the lives of others. He had written strategically and _eloquently_. He smiled with satisfaction; he may get paid for being a journalist, but he had discovered that being an activist was his true vocation.
Answer:
A- Robert <u>polished</u> his saddle.
Explanation:
If you take out "his saddle", the sentence does not make sense. Taking out "for the wagon", the sentence will still make sense. If you can take out the word(s) that the verb is applying to (what is Robert doing, he's polishing his saddle), and if the sentence does not make sense, then it is a transitive verb.
<span>We form the will-future with the auxiliary will and the infinitive of the verb. We use the the same form of the verb every time regardless the subject. In British English we sometimes use shall instead of will for the first persons (I/we). hope this works.</span>
Answer:
presidente.presidente.presidente.presidente.presidente.
