<span>Salutary neglect was an undocumented, 'though long-standing, the British policy of avoiding strict enforcement of parliamentary laws, meant to keep the American colonies obedient to Great Britain. Prime Minister Robert Walpole stated that "If no restrictions were placed on the colonies, they would flourish"[citation needed]. This policy, which lasted from about 1607 to 1763, allowed the enforcement of trade relations laws to be lenient. Walpole did not believe in enforcing the Navigation Acts, established under Oliver Cromwell and Charles II and designed to force the colonists to trade only with England, Scotland and Ireland,which were also under Britain's control. Successive British governments ended this policy through acts such as the Stamp Act and Sugar Act, causing tensions within the colonies.
Salutary neglect occurred in three time periods. From 1607 to 1696, England had no coherent imperial policy. From 1696 to 1763, England (and after 1707 Britain) tried to form a coherent policy (navigation acts) but did not enforce it. Lastly, from 1763 to 1775 Britain began to try to use a coherent policy.
Salutary neglect was a large contributing factor that led to the American Revolutionary War. Since the imperial authority did not assert the power that it had, the colonists were left to govern themselves. These essentially sovereign colonies soon became accustomed to the idea of self-control. The effects of such prolonged isolation eventually resulted in the emergence of a collective identity that considered itself separate from Great Britain.
The turning point from salutary neglect to an attempt enforce British policies was the Seven Years' War (French and Indian War). Great Britain was fighting France for imperial control of the known world (including North America, where the war was started and was losing very badly until Secretary of State William Pitt took charge. To help the war Britain toward the Colonists. These tensions caused England to abandon its policy of salutary neglect, which led directly to the American Revolution.</span>
Answer: The Song Dynasty had a large reliance on the scholar gentry class, while the Tang had very little reliance on it. The Song Dynasty didn't expand much while the Tang expanded to practically modern borders. The Tang Dynasty and the Song Dynasty both lasted about 300 years
Explanation: i dont know if that is right
Explanation:
The gains achieved by the White minority in the first four decades of the 20th century were, by the 1940s, increasingly under threat however, as African resistance to the racially based system rapidly escalated. This crisis was brought to a head by the continuing decline of the reserve economies. Full proletarianisation in South Africa, would threaten the migrant labour system upon which White profitability depended. This crisis coincided with rapid secondary industrialisation and a substantial growth of urban African populations, as well as growing trade union activity and rising African working class militancy. These developments were threatening not only the conditions for accumulation but White political hegemony itself.
Improvements in medical knowledge and public health, a more consistent food supply, drop in the death rate are some of the factors that contributed to an increase in the world population during the industrial revolution.
<h3>What happened during industrial revolution?</h3>
The Industrial Revolution occurred in the second part of the 18th century, At the time of the industrial revolution, the goods are moved from the small shops to the factories and there is an emergency of capitalization.
Thus, improvement in medical facilities and a drop in death rates are the reason for the increase in population during the industrial revolution.
Learn more about the industrial revolution here:
brainly.com/question/16279411
Dynasties<span> helped to bring power to the </span>Egyptian government, since they were weak.
Hope this helped
