The answer is 4.
Yes I think it works nicely, lol
Hope this helps!
Answer:
a
The null hypothesis is
The alternative hypothesis is
b

c
The decision rule is
Reject the null hypothesis
d
The conclusion is
There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of the immune response is equal to 1.9.
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are are told that
The variance is
The sample size is n = 30
The sample variance is
The level of significance is
The null hypothesis is
The alternative hypothesis is
Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

=> 
=> 
Generally from the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as

=> 
=> 
Generally from the chi distribution table the critical value of
at a degree of freedom of
is

=> 
Gnerally from the values obtained we see that
hence
The decision rule is
Reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of the immune response is equal to 1.9.
Answer:
just subtract 150 from 180 and it will give you 30 so 30 is b
Step-by-step explanation:
I checked too because I added 30 plus 90 plus 60 is 180 and every triangle has 180 degrees and I got 60 from the angle on the right I assumed I was 60 since its smaller than the right angle.
<span>To estimate 586 - 321, you can round the numbers up or down to the nearest five.
586 can either become 570, rounding up, or 585, rounding down, which is closer. 321 becomes 320. It's not close enough to 325, nor to 315, for either of those to be good choices. 570 - 320 = 250 and 585 - 320 = 265. The actual solution to the original problem is 265, so, the second estimate, because they both go down by 1, is the closest.</span>