Answer:
False, the angles remain unchanged
Step-by-step explanation:
Can you put spaces to make these easier to read? Plus, none of these have a horizontal asymphote of y = -3. At least if I’m understanding what you put correctly, A does have a vertical asymphote of x = -3 however.
so hmmm seemingly the graphs meet at -2 and +2 and 0, let's check
so f(x) = g(x) at those points, so let's take the integral of the top - bottom functions for both intervals, namely f(x) - g(x) from -2 to 0 and g(x) - f(x) from 0 to +2.
![\stackrel{f(x)}{2x^3-x^2-5x}~~ - ~~[\stackrel{g(x)}{-x^2+3x}]\implies 2x^3-x^2-5x+x^2-3x \\\\\\ 2x^3-8x\implies 2(x^3-4x)\implies \displaystyle 2\int\limits_{-2}^{0} (x^3-4x)dx \implies 2\left[ \cfrac{x^4}{4}-2x^2 \right]_{-2}^{0}\implies \boxed{8} \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cstackrel%7Bf%28x%29%7D%7B2x%5E3-x%5E2-5x%7D~~%20-%20~~%5B%5Cstackrel%7Bg%28x%29%7D%7B-x%5E2%2B3x%7D%5D%5Cimplies%202x%5E3-x%5E2-5x%2Bx%5E2-3x%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%202x%5E3-8x%5Cimplies%202%28x%5E3-4x%29%5Cimplies%20%5Cdisplaystyle%202%5Cint%5Climits_%7B-2%7D%5E%7B0%7D%20%28x%5E3-4x%29dx%20%5Cimplies%202%5Cleft%5B%20%5Ccfrac%7Bx%5E4%7D%7B4%7D-2x%5E2%20%5Cright%5D_%7B-2%7D%5E%7B0%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Cboxed%7B8%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5B-0.35em%5D%20~%5Cdotfill)
![\stackrel{g(x)}{-x^2+3x}~~ - ~~[\stackrel{f(x)}{2x^3-x^2-5x}]\implies -x^2+3x-2x^3+x^2+5x \\\\\\ -2x^3+8x\implies 2(-x^3+4x) \\\\\\ \displaystyle 2\int\limits_{0}^{2} (-x^3+4x)dx \implies 2\left[ -\cfrac{x^4}{4}+2x^2 \right]_{0}^{2}\implies \boxed{8} ~\hfill \boxed{\stackrel{\textit{total area}}{8~~ + ~~8~~ = ~~16}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cstackrel%7Bg%28x%29%7D%7B-x%5E2%2B3x%7D~~%20-%20~~%5B%5Cstackrel%7Bf%28x%29%7D%7B2x%5E3-x%5E2-5x%7D%5D%5Cimplies%20-x%5E2%2B3x-2x%5E3%2Bx%5E2%2B5x%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%20-2x%5E3%2B8x%5Cimplies%202%28-x%5E3%2B4x%29%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Cdisplaystyle%202%5Cint%5Climits_%7B0%7D%5E%7B2%7D%20%28-x%5E3%2B4x%29dx%20%5Cimplies%202%5Cleft%5B%20-%5Ccfrac%7Bx%5E4%7D%7B4%7D%2B2x%5E2%20%5Cright%5D_%7B0%7D%5E%7B2%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Cboxed%7B8%7D%20~%5Chfill%20%5Cboxed%7B%5Cstackrel%7B%5Ctextit%7Btotal%20area%7D%7D%7B8~~%20%2B%20~~8~~%20%3D%20~~16%7D%7D)
Answer:
d. backward sloping.
Step-by-step explanation:
The roommate receives a pay raise at her part-time job from $9 to $11 per hour and now decides to work 20 hours per week instead to 25 hours per week.
We can see that her rate is decreasing, so her labor supply curve is backward sloping or also called backward bending.
It is mostly found that worker's labor supply curve, slopes upward when they get lower wages and the curve bends backward when they get higher wages because a worker tends to work less when his wage rate rises.
Answer:
The answer is C: 120
Step-by-step explanation:
Ok so to solve this, you need to know that when "of" is in an equation, it always means multiply.
So 62% of 196 = 62% * 196.
62% * 196 = 121.52
Then you need to round 121.52 to the nearest option, which is Option C: 120.
Good luck on your assignment (or whatever this is)!! Have a nice day!!
