Answer:
<u><em>Italian immigrants and Eastern European Jewish immigrants</em></u>
Explanation:
The raids particularly targeted Italian immigrants and Eastern European Jewish immigrants with alleged leftist ties, with a particular focus on Italian anarchists and immigrant leftist labor activists. The raids and arrests occurred under the leadership of Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer, with 3,000 arrested.
Explanation:
The Munich Agreement was an astonishingly successful strategy for Adolf Hitler in the months leading up to World War II. On 30 September 1938, Germany, Britain, France, and Italy reached a settlement that permitted German annexation of the Sudetenland in western Czechoslovakia. The agreement was signed, the powers of Europe willingly conceded to Nazi Germany's demands for the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia. In March 1938, Adolf Hitler turned his attention to the ethnically German Sudetenland region of Czechoslovakia. Since its formation at the end of World War I, Czechoslovakia had been wary of possible German advances. The Czechoslovakia government strongly opposed the loss of the Sudetenland, as the region contained a vast array of natural resources. Though Hitler was willing to risk war, he soon found that the German people were not. As a result, he stepped back from the brink and sent Chamberlain a letter guaranteeing the safety of Czechoslovakia if the Sudetenland were ceded to Germany. Through diplomatic efforts, "The Munich Conference" was signed. The effects of Germany because this conference are :
1. Germany and Italy got the guarantee of Czechoslovakia when has made further progress.
2. All the misery and outrage that followed the German occupation of Vienna are now certain to follow the German occupation of the Sudetenland.
3. Germany will have annexed a vast area with great natural and industrial wealth and is not even to pay compensation for Czech property, whether private or Government.
Learn more :
1. What was the result of the Munich Conference? : brainly.com/question/1304157
2. What was the result of the Munich Agreement? :
brainly.com/question/7482633
3. What was the Munich Agreement? :
brainly.com/question/9176777
Answer details
Grade: College
Subject: History
Chapter: Munich Agreement, Definition, Summary and Significance.
Keywords: What happened after the Munich Conference?, What was the result of the Munich Agreement?, How was the Munich Conference a turning point?
<span>The reason why there was a treaty among nations of 105 in which there is a need to regulate international shipping of hazardous waste was because of a way of preventing the hazardous waste from being able to be dumped from nations that are only developing in which is not the proper way of disposing or shipping the hazardous waste.</span>
The action by the state of Maryland which led to McCulloch v. Maryland was that it attempted to stop a branch of the Second Bank of the United States from bringing in notes that were not made in Maryland, as they were taxed if they were from out of state. This case led to the necessary and proper clause being used and is one of the most famous Supreme Court cases in the history of the United States.
The Salt March on March 12, 1930
A demonstrator offers a flower to military police at a National Mobilization Committee to End the War in Vietnam-sponsored protest in Arlington, Virginia, on October 21, 1967
A "No NATO" protester in Chicago, 2012Nonviolent resistance (NVR or nonviolent action) is the practice of achieving goals such as social change through symbolic protests, civil disobedience, economic or political noncooperation, satyagraha, or other methods, while being nonviolent. This type of action highlights the desires of an individual or group that feels that something needs to change to improve the current condition of the resisting person or group. It is largely but wrongly taken as synonymous with civil resistance. Each of these terms—nonviolent resistance and civil resistance—has its distinct merits and also quite different connotations and commitments.
Major nonviolent resistance advocates include Mahatma Gandhi, Henry David Thoreau, Te Whiti o Rongomai, Tohu Kākahi, Leo Tolstoy, Alice Paul, Martin Luther King, Jr, James Bevel, Václav Havel, Andrei Sakharov, Lech Wałęsa, Gene Sharp, and many others. There are hundreds of books and papers on the subject—see Further reading below.
From 1966 to 1999, nonviolent civic resistance played a critical role in fifty of sixty-seven transitions from authoritarianism.[1] Recently, nonviolent resistance has led to the Rose Revolution in Georgia and the Orange Revolution in Ukraine. Current nonviolent resistance includes the Jeans Revolution in Belarus, the "Jasmine" Revolution in Tunisia, and the fight of the Cuban dissidents. Many movements which promote philosophies of nonviolence or pacifism have pragmatically adopted the methods of nonviolent action as an effective way to achieve social or political goals. They employ nonviolent resistance tactics such as: information warfare, picketing, marches, vigils, leafletting, samizdat, magnitizdat, satyagraha, protest art, protest music and poetry, community education and consciousness raising, lobbying, tax resistance, civil disobedience, boycotts or sanctions, legal/diplomatic wrestling, underground railroads, principled refusal of awards/honors, and general strikes. Nonviolent action differs from pacifism by potentially being proactive and interventionist.
A great deal of work has addressed the factors that lead to violent mobilization, but less attention has been paid to understanding why disputes become violent or nonviolent, comparing these two as strategic choices relative to conventional politics.[2]
Contents 1 History of nonviolent resistance2 See also2.1 Documentaries2.2 Organizations and people
