Change the mixed numbers into improper fractions:
5/3 X 9/2
Reduce - the 3 and 9 can be simplified
5/1 X 3/2
multiple numerators and denominators
15/2
Not sure how you need the answer - i would change it into a mixed number
7 1/2
Answer:
c)The proof writer mentally assumed the conclusion. He wrote "suppose n is an arbitrary integer", but was really thinking "suppose n is an arbitrary integer, and suppose that for this n, there exists an integer k that satisfies n < k < n+2." Under those assumptions, it follows indeed that k must be n + 1, which justifies the word "therefore": but of course assuming the conclusion destroyed the validity of the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
when we claim something as a hypothesis we can only conclude with therefore at the end of the proof. so assuming the conclusion nulify the proof from the beginning
im not t he best at math but i think its a base on the question
Answer:
805.98
Step-by-step explanation:
671.65x.20=134.33
134.33+671.65=805.98
Answer:
731,100
7.311 × 10^5
Step-by-step explanation:
The computation of the number of sheet used by other department is given below:
Given that
The company used 7.4 × 10^5 sheets of paper So it would be 740,000
And, The accounting department used 8.9 × 10^3 sheets so it would be 8,900
Now the number of sheet used by other department is
= 740,000 - 8,900
= 731,100
= 7.311 × 10^5
