The following answers would be best for this question would
be:
<span>1.
</span>First of all, he asked Miss Lucas. I was so
vexed to see him stand up with her! "His pride," said Miss Lucas,
"does not offend me so much as pride often does, because there is an
excuse for it. One cannot wonder that so very fine a young man, with family,
fortune, everything in his favour, should think highly of himself. If I may so
express it, he has a right to be proud."
<span>2.
</span>"That is very true," replied
Elizabeth, "and I could easily forgive his pride, if he had not mortified
mine."
These two excerpts describe the main theme of the story
which I fact is, pride and prejudice,
it states in both characters specifically Elizabeth and Darcy are in a dilemma
with their own personal conflicts; a
character vs character type of plot.
Using persuasive strategies, with the possible solution, the writer then claims that we do not use the knowledge we have with the assumption that people dont really know about alternatives.
<h3>What is persuasive strategies as regards the excerpt?</h3>
Persuasive strategies serves as one that can be used to influence audience as regards their beliefs and attitudes.
The excerpt was trying to tell us about how a solution can be found to a particular problem, the author mentioned about finding new technological means to solve a problem and he tried to emphases on this which is a Persuasive strategies.
learn more about Persuasive strategies at: brainly.com/question/24450505
#SPJ1
It has been a long time since I have read this book but I would say the moral of the Mirror of Erised is to not dwell on the past. To not focus on what you do not have and instead to focus on what you do have and make the most of it. Harry was so intrigued by seeing his family in the mirror that he no longer accepted that he was an orphan and Dum bledore had to put an end to it. Instead of dwelling on desires, make the most of what you already have.
Hope this helps! If you need any more help or further explanation just let me know! :)
I haven't a full answer for you, but here's how I'd suggest you start it:
There's clear evidence of your theme in the lines "When the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept."
Reason being: Brutus only <em>told (verbally) </em>the people that Caesar was ambitious, giving <em>no </em>examples that are actual proof of how the great Julius Caesar acted. However, Mark Antony states right off the bat of what Caesar had done in his life-time. Antony decidedly debunks Brutus of any honourable traits as he continues with his Eulogy, as the more Antony says Brutus is "honourable," the more it is hypocritically placed. (<em>What I'm trying to say here is the more Antony says Brutus is honourable, it actually counter-intuitive, Antony is trying to take away any honour the horrible man had.)</em>
