1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
puteri [66]
3 years ago
5

What were 3 methods the U.S. used to help the South Vietnamese government resist communism?

History
1 answer:
Murljashka [212]3 years ago
6 0
Vietcong, SEATO and the US produced weapons
You might be interested in
Using your economic knowledge and your research, compose a 350- to 450-word editorial that evaluates the effectiveness of these
NemiM [27]

Answer:

The benefits of trade agreements are not felt evenly by all industries in an economy. In fact, even member nations gain varying advantages by entering into trade agreements. However, despite these drawbacks, the United States continues to act on its commitment to free trade. In 2005, the United States signed a fair trade agreement (FTA) with Australia, and in 2012, it signed a trade protection agreement (TPA) with Colombia. Both agreements have been in force for a while. Now the question is, Have these agreements benefited the US economy? Let’s examine the impact of the bilateral agreements with Colombia and Australia on the US economy.

According to the USTR, the International Trade Commission (ITC) predicted that the United States–Colombia TPA would increase national GDP by $2.5 billion (Office of the US Trade Representative). Under the TPA, US exports to Colombia increased from $12.0 billion in 2010 to $18.3 billion in 2013 (US Department of State). The TPA seems to have delivered on its promise, because according to the USTR, US exports to Colombia increased by 30% in 2013 (Office of the US Trade Representative). So financially, Colombia is a lucrative market for the United States. However, the main opposition to the TPA stemmed from concerns about the terrible labor conditions in Colombia and the violent threats to those seeking to improve labor conditions in a country rife with crime. Although violence is a major concern, the FTA will eventually help both nations by bringing about social and labor reforms through economic activity. By helping Colombia become a peaceful country, the United States can pave the way for increased trade with Colombia in the future.

The United States–Australia FTA received considered opposition in both countries. US dairy farmers, ranchers, and small farmers were anxious about job losses resulting from the free entry of Australian products into the US market. However, if we judge by the boost in exports, the FTA has contributed to overall US economic growth. According to the USTR, in the first five years of the FTA, US exports to Australia increased by 33% (Office of the US Trade Representative). The FTA removed all tariffs on American imports into Australia, giving US exporters barrier-free entry into Australian markets.

The export industry plays a key role in driving economic growth and generating jobs in the United States. Colombia and Australia are two large and important markets for US exporters. The United States faces competition from other nations for access to these markets. By signing trade agreements, American goods can compete effectively in these markets. Although the agreements with Colombia and Australia are opposed for valid reasons, the agreements will benefit the US economy over time

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
What was one significant indication that the European feudal system was effective
bearhunter [10]
Kings ruled with absolute power which let the poor stay poor and the rich stay rich
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Copernicus expect people would react to his theory that the Earth, not the Sun, moves?
Serhud [2]

Answer:

People believed that the Earth was actually the center of the universe, and he was concerned about publishing his ideas because this was very frowned upon and he would get harshly critcized and most likely punished for this idea.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
The Indian Removal Act of 1830 authorized the removal of American Indians
Verizon [17]
A. east of the Mississippi River 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is it important for students of history to question and evaluate the history they read
erastovalidia [21]

To ensure that their facts that they are studying are correct.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was the population density of most of the land in nevada wyoming arizona and oklahoma in 1890?
    6·1 answer
  • Why was the second great awakening important
    8·1 answer
  • What happened to World War I veterans as a result of the Depression?
    6·2 answers
  • What was the innermost layer of king tuts coffin made out of?
    7·1 answer
  • Developing Critical Thinking
    10·1 answer
  • What year did thousands of people go to California to find gold?
    13·2 answers
  • Why did Franklin D. Roosevelt go to georgia?
    10·1 answer
  • How did bimetallism help with railroads?
    14·2 answers
  • Who was the longest serving chief justice in the history of the united states?
    10·2 answers
  • Where did a country's wealth come from?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!