How could shifts in the physical environment have caused major changes in early civilizations?

2 answers:

5 0

It could cause major changes because, for example, Egypt was a very wet place, the Egyptians wouldn't build their buildings out of mud bricks because they would erode super fast. So change in the physical environment could change the way civilizations built their buildings, grow their food, or the way they travel.

Alexeev081 [22]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The shifts in the climate in the early civilization could have changed the structure of civilization by pushing them to rise and fall. Climate change, especially drought and heavy rainfall might have been partly responsible for destroying the crops, which would eventually rise to hunger and starvation. Another reason could be the natural calamities like Earthquake and Volcanoes eruption might have destroyed the entire communities.

You might be interested in

According to the English bill of rights, who had to agree to taxation for it to be lawful

Dima020 [189]

Answer:

Parliament / The People

Explanation:

The English Bill of Rights 1689 had forbidden the imposition of taxes without the consent of Parliament; however, the colonists had no representation in Parliament. As such, the taxes violated the guaranteed rights of the colonists. ( No representation = Unlawful taxation. )

8 0

3 years ago

Please help fast

Sphinxa [80]

Answer:

Both were ruled by powerful leaders

7 0

3 years ago

What places formed the points of the triangle in the triangular trade?

Tju [1.3M]

Answer:

The points of the Triangular Trade were Africa, the Americas and Europe. Finished good were taken from Europe to Africa and exchanged for enslaved people. Enslaved people were taken to America and exchanged for unfinished goods, which were in turn taken back to Europe.

Explanation: The TransAtlantic Slave Trade involved the transport of millions of enslavd people over a period of 400 years.

7 0

3 years ago

Explain the difference between the following.

lianna [129]

Settlement patterns
Although the land that now constitutes the United States was occupied and much affected by diverse Indian cultures over many millennia, these pre-European settlement patterns have had virtually no impact upon the contemporary nation—except locally, as in parts of New Mexico. A benign habitat permitted a huge contiguous tract of settled land to materialize across nearly all the eastern half of the United States and within substantial patches of the West. The vastness of the land, the scarcity of labour, and the abundance of migratory opportunities in a land replete with raw physical resources contributed to exceptional human mobility and a quick succession of ephemeral forms of land use and settlement. Human endeavours have greatly transformed the landscape, but such efforts have been largely destructive. Most of the pre-European landscape in the United States was so swiftly and radically altered that it is difficult

8 0

3 years ago

Why did conditions of the farmers improve in the years after 1896 despite william jennings bryan’s loss in the election?

alex41 [277]

Although William Jennings Bryan lost the elections in 1896, the living and working conditions of the farmers improved remarkably. This happened because, first through the Farmers Alliance and then through the Populist Party, the farmers began to claim their rights and, although slowly, their claims began to be heard by the state and federal governments.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers