Answer:
A. Check attachment for proportion hypothesis test
B. Type I error is to conclude that less than 50% of adults in Suva have a will when actual probability is less than 0.5
Probability of type I error= significance level= 0.05
C. If type I error is zero, then we would not be able to reject the null hypothesis
Answer:
The depreciation expense for the year 2017 will be $17664.
Explanation:
The double declining balance method is an accelerated method of charging depreciation on an asset. The depreciation rate under double declining balance method is twice of that of the straight line method and it charges higher depreciation in the initial years and less depreciation in the later years as it charges depreciation on the book value of the asset at start.
The formula for double declining method depreciation is,
Depreciation expense = 2 * Straight line Depreciation rate * Book Value at start of the period
The straight line depreciation rate is, 100% / 10 = 10% per year
The Depreciation expense for 2015 = 2 * 10% * 138000 = $27600
Book value at end of 2015 = 138000 - 27600 = $110400
The Depreciation expense for 2016 = 2 * 10% * 110400 = $22080
Book value at end of 2015 = $110400 - 22080 = $88320
The Depreciation expense for 2017 = 2 * 10% * 88320 = $17664
Book value at end of 2015 = 88320 - 17664 = $70656
Answer:
A IS THE ANSWER
Explanation:
TO CONVERT KG TO CG YOU MULTIPLY YOUR NUMBER BY 100000 SO 32.7 x 100000 = 3,270,000 cg
Answer:
The stock dividends are not taxable in 2009 for this case
Explanation:
A. According to the US taxatation regulation in this particular case the stock dividend is not taxable because it is <em>pro rata</em> to all the shareholders.
<em>pro rata means proportional.</em>
<em />
<em />
Answer:
Manufacturing overhead for the month was underapplied by $8,250.
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that the total debits of manufacturing overhead is $75,150 and the total credits of manufacturing overhead is $66,900
So the difference is of
= $75,150 - $66,900
= $8,250
This amount would be reflected as an underapplied overhead
This is the answer and the same is to considered
The all options that are given are wrong.