Answer:
The estimate value of the subject property is $8,269,200
The other information that would be desirable in reaching a conclusion:
The closeness of the property to central business districts as the closer it is the higher the asking price.
The estimate was solely based on revenue, the applicable costs have been ignored.
The average taken might not be a good indication for the subject property because the property might have unique features
Explanation:
The formula for Gross Rent Multiplier is given Property Price / Gross Monthly Rental Income.
In determining the estimate value of the subject property ,we calculate the gross rent multiplier of the new property,then multiply it with the annual rental income.
In ascertaining the GRM of the new property we take the average GRM of the two similar properties in the same area.This is because the new property judging from number of units, lies in-between the other two properties.
GRM for Oaks
GRM=$9000000/($550*140)
GRM =116.88
GRM for Palms
GRM=$6,600,000/($650*90)
GRM =112.82
The average GRM=(116.88+112.82)/2
=114.85
Subject property price=114.85*(120*$600)
=$8,269,200
I will assume this is a true or false question, the answer is true. Requirements analysis, likewise called requirements engineering, is the way toward deciding client desires for another or altered item. These elements, called necessities, must be quantifiable, significant and point by point. In programming building, such necessities are frequently called utilitarian particulars.
Answer:
Option (D) is correct.
Explanation:
In United states:
Can produce 25 tons of steel or 250 automobiles,
Opportunity cost of producing a ton of steel = 250 ÷ 25
= 10 automobiles
Opportunity cost of producing 1 automobile = 25 ÷ 250
= 0.1 tons of steel
In Japan:
Can produce 30 tons of steel or 275 automobiles,
Opportunity cost of producing a ton of steel = 275 ÷ 30
= 9.17 automobiles
Opportunity cost of producing 1 automobile = 30 ÷ 275
= 0.11
Therefore,
United States has a comparative advantage in producing automobiles because the opportunity cost of producing automobiles is lower than the Japan.
Japan has a comparative advantage in producing steel because the opportunity cost of producing steel is lower than the United states.
Answer:
Allocated MOH= $4,000
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Machine hours used 1,000 hours
If total manufacturing overhead costs during the month totaled $100,000 when a total of 25,000 machine hours were used
First, we need to calculate the estimated overhead rate:
Estimated manufacturing overhead rate= total estimated overhead costs for the period/ total amount of allocation base
Estimated manufacturing overhead rate= 100,000/25,000= $4 per machine hour
Now, we can allocate overhead to Product 95:
Allocated MOH= Estimated manufacturing overhead rate* Actual amount of allocation base
Allocated MOH= 4*1,000= $4,000
Answer:
<u> selling price at year 3:</u> $ 188.89
<u>at constant dollar year 3:</u> $ 167.94
Explanation:
selling price x accumualte raises:
![150 \times (1+0.06) \times (1+0.08) \times (1+0.10)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=150%20%5Ctimes%20%281%2B0.06%29%20%5Ctimes%20%281%2B0.08%29%20%5Ctimes%20%281%2B0.10%29)
![150 \times 1,25928](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=150%20%5Ctimes%201%2C25928%E2%80%AC)
selling price: 188,892
now, to calculate the constante dollar we discount for inflation:
![188.892 \div ((1+0.03) \times (1+0.04) \times (1+0.05))](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=188.892%20%5Cdiv%20%28%281%2B0.03%29%20%5Ctimes%20%281%2B0.04%29%20%5Ctimes%20%281%2B0.05%29%29)
![188.892 \div 1,12476](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=188.892%20%5Cdiv%201%2C12476%E2%80%AC)
constant dollar selling price: 167,9398271