<span>According to Rawl's social justice, principles of justice should be chosen by persons ignorant of their societal status. Rawls suggests that you imagine yourself in an original position behind a veil of ignorance. Behind this veil, you know nothing of yourself and your natural abilities, or your position in society.</span>
This is called the ________ person standard.
Reasonable
Answer:It is certain and evident to our senses that some things are in motion. Whatever is in motion is moved by another, for a thing can be in motion only if it has a potentiality for that towards which it is being moved, while a thing moves insofar as it is actual. for motion means the reduction of something from a state of potentiality into a state of actuality. but a thing can be reduced from a state of potentiality into a state of actuality only by something already in a state of actuality. thus that which is actually hot such as fire, makes wood, which is potentially hot, to be actually hot and thereby moves and changes it. it is impossible for the same thing should be simultaneously in a state of actuality and potentiality from the same point of view, but only from different points of view. what is actually hot cannot simultaneously be only potentially hot...if that by which is put in motion is itself put in motion, then this also must be put in motion by another, and that by another again. this cannot go on to infinity, because then there would be no first mover, and consequently, no other movers-since subsequent movers only move insofar as they are put int motion by the first mover, just as the staff only moves because it is put in motion by the hand. therefore it is necessary to arrive at a first mover, put in motion by no other; and this everyone understands to be God.
Explanation:
Answer:
There would be a conflict
Explanation:
President Abraham Lincoln dealt with one of the most decisive question is his term as a president, that was short lived by his assassination by an actor called Booth. One of the decision was the granting of the freedom to the slaves. This was a dilemma since the south had freed slaves and they had the freedom to be free citizens. The North, however, still had the practice of slave keeping. This, they argued, would increase the profits for the nation. Thus, the nation would be plunged into a civil war. Hence the freeing of slaves was a dilemma. Eventually, slavery was abolished under his rule.
Measure the lakes and see what happens next