Find two sentences in the book Catcher in the Rye with a common noun and two with a proper noun. 2. Write the four sentences following this example: "Phoebe was a great sister" (19). [common noun] Notice the sentence is in quotes. Notice the page number is in parentheses. Notice the period comes after the parentheses. Notice that the common noun is underlined. Notice that the type of noun is identified in brackets.
The following sentence is in active voice.
Answer:
The speaker explains that he is forced to spend time apart from his lover, but before he leaves, he tells her that their farewell should not be the occasion for mourning and sorrow. In the same way that virtuous men die mildly and without complaint, he says, so they should leave without “tear-floods” and “sigh-tempests,” for to publicly announce their feelings in such a way would profane their love. The speaker says that when the earth moves, it brings “harms and fears,” but when the spheres experience “trepidation,” though the impact is greater, it is also innocent. The love of “dull sublunary lovers” cannot survive separation, but it removes that which constitutes the love itself; but the love he shares with his beloved is so refined and “Inter-assured of the mind” that they need not worry about missing “eyes, lips, and hands.”
Though he must go, their souls are still one, and, therefore, they are not enduring a breach, they are experiencing an “expansion”; in the same way that gold can be stretched by beating it “to aery thinness,” the soul they share will simply stretch to take in all the space between them. If their souls are separate, he says, they are like the feet of a compass: His lover’s soul is the fixed foot in the center, and his is the foot that moves around it. The firmness of the center foot makes the circle that the outer foot draws perfect: “Thy firmness makes my circle just, / And makes me end, where I begun.”
Explanation:
Answer:
It can be inferred that Allen believes the case of flag-burning can be handled just like any other case and all the opinions on the topic are all welcome.
The text evidence is "not treating the flag-burning case like the simple case it is".
Explanation:
Based on the given lines, it can be inferred that Allen shared his opinion and he believes that the specific case could be analyzed in a manner that is similar to those used for other similar cases. This is based on the line in the text as quoted above. The suggestions from everyone on the specific issue can be tabled and considered.
