Answer:
5
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
1.) 434 ____________
2.)5658 ____________
3.) 8374 ____________
4.) 361 ____________
5.) 7454 ____________
ito po ba ang i raround off
Step-by-step explanation:
answer:
1. 400
2.5000
3.8000
4.400
5.7000
kung ito po
#HOPE ITS HELP
Step-by-step explanation:
no it is not because if 3 maps on 2, then it cannot map on -2 at the same time
The error that Bryan has done in this inequality is that he included –14 in his solution set.
<h3>How to point out the mistake made</h3>
What Bryan has to do would be to write this inequality in such a way that the variable would appear on the left.
But the symbol that he has chosen does not move in this same direction as the graph.
The -14 should not be inclusive in the graph because it is not a part of the graph solution.
He used the wrong number in this inequality.
Read more on inequalities here:
brainly.com/question/24372553
#SPJ1
Oil and gas production would most likely stop because it is very dangerous to be outside in a hurricane.