1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kruka [31]
4 years ago
5

The blank union was known for staging voilent strikes against companies?

History
1 answer:
alina1380 [7]4 years ago
4 0
The KNIGHTS OF LABOR was known for staging violent strikes against companies.
You might be interested in
What adjective best describes young Henry spelman?
Andreyy89

Answer:

3-daring

Explanation:

Henry spelman at the age of 13 went to the new Vi.rginia colony at Jamestown as a  boy-lab-orer.

Henry spelman was a daring boy who da-red to live with Powhatan Indians first where he saw many hos-tile  enco-unters between the Powhatan Indians and English and da-red to live there even after witnessing the worst situation. Later he returned to England to go back to Jamestown, his native place.

<u>He did not ran from the situation rather he faced the horrific events between the Po-whatan Indians and English and still survived.</u>

Hence, the correct answer is "3-daring".

8 0
3 years ago
The U.S. could not fully commit to two wars, so priority was given to the war in:
inn [45]

Bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbvbbvbbvvvvv

8 0
3 years ago
How did most american military women serve in vietnam?
lukranit [14]
Most women that served in Vietnam were nurses<span />
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who has the hardest job when it comes to foreign policy
ANTONII [103]

Answer:

Congress has little to no role in foreign policy. Affirming or rejecting treaties or confirming the Secretary of State, who conducts foreign policy for POTUS. That’s about it.

POTUS is Constitutionally tasked with carrying out relations with foreign powers. The thought being that the Nation should speak with one voice. That isn’t to say that Congress doesn’t make their opinions heard but they have no actual authority.

The WAR POWERS ACT of 1973 (?) was an attempt to put a Congressional check on the military power of POTUS. It’s largely been a failure as Congress Critters are notoriously spineless. They would rather punt the responsibility and whine about the result that take any flack at the outcome.

But I’m not cynical about our Honored Congress.

7 0
3 years ago
How did the number of free states and slave states affect representation in Congress ?
Alenkinab [10]

____________________________________________________

Answer:

There were more free states than slave states, so most of the people in congress were against slavery.

____________________________________________________

The number of free states and slave states affected the representation in Congress because there were more free states than slave states, so most people that represented a state in Congress were for anti-slavery, or against slavery since they're part of a free state in which they didn't have slavery.

____________________________________________________

Definitions:

Free State:

What a free state was is a state that didn't have slavery in it, which means the people in the state are free. Free states were mostly the states in the Northern side of the United States. Most of the states were free states

Slave state:

What a slave state was is a state that had slavery in it, which means that slavery is active and legal in the state. Slave states were mostly the states in the Southern side of the United States. Some of the states were slavery states.

____________________________________________________

Explanation:

The reason on why "There were more free states than slave states, so most of the people in congress were against slavery" would be your answer is because during the times of slavery, the way the government looked like were based off of people's belief in slavery. People that are part of a free state were most likely against the idea of slavery, and thinks that it's wrong. But on the other hand, people that were part of a slave state were most likely for slavery, since the slave states had a lot of slavery. This affected the representatives in Congress because people from different states are representing a state that is either a free state or slave state. One part of Congress chamber is made up of senators, in which the senators represent different states. Since there were more free m states than slave starts, more senators that were part of Congress were against slavery, since the amount of states there were that were free dominated the amount of states that were slave states. Therefore, to sum it all up, most people that were representing a state in Congress were against slavery.

____________________________________________________

-Julie

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did christopher columbus think the earth was smaller than it was?
    15·1 answer
  • ANYONE GO TO K12? then can you help me with SS_Partioning Writing Assingment i hae tried it 3 times and failed it all 3 time can
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following describes a difference between France just after the
    11·1 answer
  • What the name of usa before independence?
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement about the United States' entry into World War II is correct?
    10·1 answer
  • Which power does the U.S. Constitution give the president?
    7·2 answers
  • How did the Industrial Revolution help to put America on the world map, so to speak
    8·2 answers
  • I need help with this
    10·1 answer
  • &lt;
    12·1 answer
  • What is the summary of the story big finish?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!