Answer:
4.4
Step-by-step explanation:
that is the procedure above
Leah claims that these figures are not similar. When she compared the heights, she wrote 2/7. Then she compared the bases and 21
/.
1 answer:
Answer:
The two figures are similar and hey are not solid.
Step-by-step explanation:
I think your question is missed of key information, allow me to add in and hope it will fit the original one.
<em>Leah claims that these figures are not similar. When she compared the heights, she wrote 2/7. Then she compared the bases and 21/6. Why is Leah having trouble? Explain completely</em>
(Please have a look at the attached photo)
My answer:
In the first ratio, she compared the small figure's height to the large figure's height that is: 2/7
In the second ratio, she compared the large figure's base to the small figure's base that is: 21/6
=> She is wrong in this step, the ratio must be 6/21
Hence she needs to compare bases and heights thorugh division because the ratio between heights and the ratio between bases must be equal
The scales are equal
=> Therefore, those rectangles are congruent.
You might be interested in
9 would be the first number and 7 would be the second.
Answer:
(a) 720 ways
(b) 120 ways
(c) 24 ways
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
--- number of letters
Solving (a): Number of arrangements.
We have:
So, the number of arrangements is calculated as:
This gives:
This gives:
Solving (b): DA as a unit
DA as a unit implies that, we have:
[DA] N C E R
So, we have:
So, the number of arrangements is calculated as:
This gives:
This gives:
Solving (c): NCE as a unit
NCE as a unit implies that, we have:
D A [NCE] R
So, we have:
So, the number of arrangements is calculated as:
This gives:
This gives:
Answer:
It would be 1.5m+4 is greater than or equal to 7. This is because 1.5m is the regular rate of growth, plus the 4cm already grown. She wants the hair to be no shorter than 7cm. So, the 15m+4 has to be greater than the 7cm.
Step-by-step explanation:
