Answer:
mean = sum of the terms/total no. of terms
mean = (16+12+13+22)/4
mean = 63/4 or 15.75
Answer:
The answer to your question is 6.- B 7.- D
Step-by-step explanation:
Data
Parallelogram ACFG
6.-
m∠GAC = 112°
m∠ACF = ?
Process
These angles are supplementary, they measure the same.
∠GAC + ∠ACF = 180
-Substitution
112 + ∠ACF = 180°
-Solve for ∠ACF
∠ACF = 180° - 112°
-Result
∠ACF = 68°
7.-
m∠AGF = 2a + 10
m∠ACF = a + 20
The angles ∠GAC and ACF are equal, they measure the same.
∠GAC = ∠ACF
-Substitution
a + 20 = 2a + 10
-Solve for a
a - 2a = 10 - 20
-Result
-a = -10
a = 10
-Find ∠AGF
∠AGF = 2(10) + 10
20 + 10
= 30°
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Interest earned is proportional to the interest rate, so if the interest earned is the same, the amounts invested must be inversely proportional to the interest rates. That is, for the 3% and 2% accounts, the ratio of money invested is 2:3.
In other words, 2/5 of the money ($3200) was invested at 3%, and 3/5 of the money ($4800) was invested at 2%.
_____
If you need an equation, you can let x represent the amount invested at the highest rate. Then 8000-x is the amount invested at the lower rate. For the interest in the two accounts to be equal, we have ...
3%·x = 2%·(8000-x) . . . . . the amounts of interest earned are the same
3/2·x = 8000 -x . . . . . . . . divide by 2%
5/2·x = 8000 . . . . . . . . . . . add x and simplify
x = 8000·(2/5) = 3200 . . . multiply by the inverse of the x coefficient
8000-x = 8000 -3200 = 4800 . . . . the amount invested at the lower rate
Tamara invested $3200 in the 3% account and $4800 in the 2% account.
_____
She earned $96 in each account for the year.
Answer:
We can assume that the statistic is 

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given
we have
so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the true proportion of interest is not different from 3/5
Step-by-step explanation:
Concepts and formulas to use
We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion is equal to 3/5 or not.:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:
(1)
The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion
is significantly different from a hypothesized value
.
Calculate the statistic
We can assume that the statistic is 
Statistical decision
It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.
The significance level provided
. The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.
Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given
we have
so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the true proportion of interest is not different from 3/5