Answer:
Explanation:
a. Parties who legally own the company
The kind of corporation that is owned by the shareholders is a stock insurer. While when policy holders elect board of directors then that is call a mutual insurer. This board of director enjoys control over the management control of the corporation.
b. Right to assess policyholders additional premiums
An asses sable policy can not be issued by the stock insurers, however policy of such kind can be issued by the mutual insurer. For mutual insurer, this policy depends on what kind of insurer is in place.
c. Right of policyholders to elect the board of directors
For stock insurer, its is the stockholders who elect the board of directors. While for mutual insurer, its the owners who elect the board of directors who have an effective control over the management.
If you are a girl the media expects you to be girly and like shopping and putting on makeup, some girls hate that stuff
Answer:
$48,000
Explanation:
The computation of the total amount paid to the preferred shareholder is shown below:
= Number of preferred stock shares × par value × dividend rate × number of years
= 1,200 shares × $100 × 10% × 4 years
= $48,000
Simply we multiplied with the number of preferred stock with the par value, its dividend rate and the time period so that the correct value can come
All other information which is given is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
Answer: The answers are provided below
Explanation:
There are several similarities between the project management processes which surround scrum to the traditional project management processes which surrounds a project life cycle such as Waterfall. When one looks at each iteration as a project, one will see that Scrum planning meeting will be identical to planning meeting of the traditional project.
The daily standups in scrum will resemble the monitoring and the controlling of traditional waterfall with the exception that in scrum, its team monitors itself. A sprint would be the execution stage while the sprint review will be like project closure lessons that are learned. Sprint can be seen as small waterfall model project.
However, the main difference is in the scrum's team mindset versus the team of the traditional project management. Also, the process of work defining as being completed is different for the teams. Lastly, the method used by the scrum team in its approaches to work, team collaboration, responsibility acceptance, tasks definition and accountability are different from the traditional project management team.
A hybrid approach will be sensible in a large organization which has pockets of power. This is true for large retails that have old legacy systems in which frequent deployments aren't possible.
This is true for systems in which, testing can't be automated due to the fact that automated testing is a vital part for success for large scrum projects. In such organizations, it is sensible to use scrum for the teams which are able to move to scrum and waterfall can be used for other parts of the organization.
