Answer:
$7,500
Explanation:
Taxable income:
= Income from operations + Dividends received - Expenses from operations
= $200,000 + $15,000 - 140,000
= $75,000
Deductions is allowed only to the maximum extent of 10% of the taxable income of the corporation.
Therefore,
Kingbird's charitable contribution deduction:
= 10% of Taxable income
= 0.1 × $75,000
= $7,500
Quantity supplied equals to quantity demanded.
Answer:
so correct option is b. -27%
Explanation:
given data
job manufacturing industry = 63.1 thousand
annual rate = 1.7 thousand
time period = 10 year
solution
the total loss of jobs over the 10 years will be:
total loss = 1.7 × 10
total loss = 17 thousand jobs
so that the percent change will be
percent change = 
percent change = -27 %
so correct option is b. -27%
Answer: (a) $295 million
(b) $326 million
Explanation:
Given that,
Sales = $900 million during 2016
Cash = $871 million
Cost of goods sold = $280 million
Expenses for the year totaled = $325 million
Paid for Inventory = $375 million
Paid for everything else = $285 million
Beginning cash = $115 million
(a) Net Income = Sales - Cost of goods sold - Expenses for the year totaled
= $900 - $280 - $325
= $295 million
(b) Carter's cash balance at the end of 2016:
= Cash + Beginning cash - Paid for Inventory - Paid for everything else
= $871 + $115 - $375 - $285
= $326 million
Answer:
Three part test.
The outcome: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
At the end, the law will be held.
Explanation:
In some cases, the courts are allowed to protect individual, company or business organization from Government interrupting with these individuals or business organization "fundamental right" and this is the "substantive due process rights " of insurance companies as mentioned in the question above.
The test that the United State Supreme Court can use to determine whether the regulations they want to enact would violate the substantive due process rights of insurance companies is what is known as the THREE PARR TEST.
THE THREE PART TEST has its root from cases such as that of Pasgraf V Long Island Railroad co. The three part test involves three main subjects and they are;
=> foreseeability: are the policies in which insurance companies work going to affect the consumers in the future?
=> proximity: what kind of relationship do the insurance companies have with there consumers?
=> fairness: are these policies just and fair?
CONCLUSION: if the three requirements are not met, then there is not point the Government should interfere.
