Explanation:
I think u can expect to be asked why do u want to work for the company but I am not sure it said u can expect so if u think or know or prepared for the interview u will be prepared of the options c Question because u expect it on the interview. sorry for the uncertainty but I think I gave u a good reason
Answer:
$0.86
Explanation:
Earnings per Share = Earnings attributable to holders of Common Stock ÷ Weighted Number of Common Stocks Outstanding.
where,
Earnings attributable to holders of Common Stock = $163.82 million
and,
Weighted Number of Common Stocks Outstanding = 191.33 million
Therefore
Earnings Per Share = $163.82 million ÷ 191.33 million
= $0.86
Answer: Setup time is dependent on the number of units subsequently produced.
Explanation:
It should be noted that a setup is a required activity and a set of activities. A setup time is also referred to as the changeover time.
The statement that "Setup time is dependent on the number of units subsequently produced" is false. The setup time refers to the interval that is needed to adjust the machine settings in order to make it ready to process a job. The setup time isn't dependent on the number of units that's subsequently manufactured.
Answer:
It is cheaper to make the part. In three years the company will save $12,000.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Units= 40,000
Variable costs= $1.60 per unit
Fixed costs= $40,000 per year
Gilberto is considering buying the part from a supplier for a quoted price of $2.70 per unit guaranteed for three years.
We need to calculate the total cost of making and buying the part.
Make in-house:
Total cost= 1.6*40,000 + 40,000= $104,000
Buy:
Total cost= 40,000*2.7= $108,000
It is cheaper to make the part. In three years the company will save $12,000.
Answer:
Mark should include in the letter to avoid litigation charges:
Specific facts about the consultant that can be verified.
Explanation:
False information, sentiment-hurting statements, or personal opinions about the consultant's character should never be found in formal letters that are meant to offer constructive criticisms. This means that only specific facts that are verifiable should be included. Formal letters are not avenues for character defamation. They are called "formal" because they must stick to specific and relevant official purposes.