1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ololo11 [35]
2 years ago
9

Great leaders need to have a vision for the future and they must have a plan to carry out that dream.

History
2 answers:
gladu [14]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Trust me and literally everybody else that answered this question.

MissTica2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

the answer is true

Explanation:i just did it in e d g e n u i t y trust me

You might be interested in
Select all that apply. During the Korean War:
ira [324]

Answer:

Chinese volunteers supported North Korea.

5 0
3 years ago
BRAINLIESTTT ASAP!!!
KIM [24]

Hi Geny5,

Your Question:

In one complete paragraph explain the role the city (LIBSON) played during the Renaissance, Reformation, Counter reformation, or period of European exploration.

Answer:

Lisbon was a commerce city thats was a great trade center of spices. Vasco De Gama was the one that made it to Calicut that was known as the European Exploration. Lisbon is the capital of portugal.

4 0
3 years ago
What was the reasons why the asians came to america 15000 years ago
love history [14]
Because america had better living condition
5 0
3 years ago
How were opponents of Hiram Rhodes Revels trying to use the Fourteenth Amendment to
9966 [12]

Answer:

United States Senate in 187o and argue that Dred Scott had ever been

authoritative. "I never expected to hear read in the Senate of the

United States, or in any court of justice where authority was looked

for, the Dred Scott decision," said Senator James Nye of Nevada.40

Senator Jacob Howard of Michigan was less civil. He pronounced himself "nauseated," disdaining entirely the thought of going "into that

recondite inquiry as to the political status of a black man under the

Dred Scott decision."41 Not to be outdone, Senator Charles Sumner of

Massachusetts declared that Dred Scott had been "[b]orn a putrid

corpse," and described it as "a stench in the nostrils ... to be remembered only as a warning and a shame. '42

In a mirror image of the Democratic belief that the Fourteenth

Amendment had not validly overruled Dred Scott, many Republicans believed that Dred Scott had no legal force even without the Fourteenth Amendment. One can distinguish two forms of that belief. The

first, which might follow from Senator Sumner's description of Dred

Scott as "born a putrid corpse," is that Dred Scott was so wrong as to

have been invalid ab initio. The other, which is more complex conceptually but yields the same result, is that events following Dred Scott - the election of President Lincoln, Southern secession, the Civil War,

emancipation, and perhaps the postwar constitutional amendments - amounted to a radical break with the past, one that made it senseless

to treat certain legal authorities from the old regime as if they had continuing meaning. On this view, the Republican position might not be

that Revels had been a citizen for nine chronological years before 1870,

or at least not in a sense that could be confirmed by asking whether a

court in i86i would have deemed him a citizen. Instead, the position would be that in 1870, it was impermissible to betray fundamental

principles of the new order by giving legal effect to the fact that other

principles - evil principles - had been applied at an earlier time.

Whatever people might have done in 1857 or i86i, this perspective

would hold, it would violate the norms of 187o to give continuing force

to Dred Scott.

Although not always clearly distinguishing between those two positions, several Republicans argued that the Civil War itself demonstrated Dred Scott's invalidity. "The comment made upon that great wrongful judicial decision is to be seen in the dreadful war through

which we have passed," said Senator Howard.43 Senator Frederick

Sawyer, a transplanted Bostonian representing South Carolina, spoke of the war as "the great court of errors" that had reversed the Taney

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
In 1874, how did many Sioux respond to the federal government’s order to remain on their reservation?
Sonja [21]

Answer:

The Sioux followed the order and remained on the reservation. In 1874, leaders of the Sioux tribe responded to the federal government's order to remain on their reservation. People of the Sioux tribe gave up 90% of their land for supplies.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The forced conquered peoples to pay tribute to the the monarch.
    12·2 answers
  • How did polk try to resolve the california issue without bloodshed?
    10·1 answer
  • What were president Lincoln's reasons for issuing the emancipation proclamation, and why did it free only those slaves who lived
    5·1 answer
  • 1. Briefly describe three different aspects of manor life.<br> (a) The Fields and Farmlands
    11·1 answer
  • *WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!*
    5·2 answers
  • Plz help !!!
    11·1 answer
  • What European country had the most ships in 1600? * England Netherlands O Spain O Portugal​
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the features on this map likely contributes most to the arid climate
    13·1 answer
  • Helppppp
    13·2 answers
  • What are three ways the Harlem Renaissance impacted African American
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!