The best answer that supports your question is letter B. Europeans wanted to curb the power of the church and the feudal system made it clear that nobles would write local laws, organize courts and collect taxes. I hope you are satisfied with my answer and feel free to ask for more.
Answer:
no he wasnt
Sure he removes the Royalty and all, but he never manages to do better in the ruling. He was power crazy, he kill those who disagree with him and use people to maintain his power, and all his promise for prosperity never achieved in his lives. Heck, he actually loses his first election and calls it void. He was a tyrannical ruler that are only slightly better than the old royalty, and better than Stalin who came after him.
He is not exactly the best example of a hero is. He is more of an idealist, and not cut out as a ruler, and he should never have come into power. Maybe as revolutioner, he is good and all but the person who should come into power should have been someone else.
Answer:
Pashas (provincial rulers) has increased their power. Economic problems and corruption was there. Nationalist movements caused revolts in North Africa, Eastern Europe, and the Middle East.
Explanation:
