The summary should be done to present your understanding of the book and its elements. I can't write the summary for you, but I'll show you how to do it.
<h3>Explanation of the elements that must be present in the summary:</h3>
- Tom: the feeling that the text conveyed to you.
- Environment: The setting where the story takes place.
- Sensory Images: Descriptions of people or things done in the text that can stimulate your senses and make you feel what was being described.
- Main characters: The characters that provoke the most important parts of the story and promote the movement of the plot.
To write the summary, you must first read the book to which the question refers. As you read, you will be able to identify the elements described above. To improve your understanding and identification of these elements, you can search for articles that analyze this book and direct you to the plot.
In this form, you can write your summary by following these steps:
- First paragraph: Introduce the book, and the author, and give a brief overview of the plot, setting, and characters.
- Second paragraph: Show the tone of the text and how that tone is established within the most important events of the book and the behavior of its characters.
- Third paragraph: Show how the book is descriptive, capable of creating sensory images and making reading even more efficient.
Below you can see an example of how you can start the summary:
<em>"Taíno" written by Jose Barreiro is a book that bets on the colonization of America and the different and sometimes conflicting visions between Europeans and indigenous people. This is done through the story of the young Taíno, who, when adopted by Cristovon Colombo, embarks on adventures in the American continent and has experiences in culture, colony, environment, and power.</em>
Learn more about writing a summary at the link:
brainly.com/question/24858866
#SPJ1
The answer really depends on whether the farmer is also the landlord or only a worker in the fields, and bearing in mind that the question refers only to Chavez’ reforms, not what is now called Chavismo, that is to say, the rule of President Maduro.
If the first, then there are chances that the landlord would feel threatened about the fact this his land could be —although not necessarily— appropriated by the State, but also, he might feel relieved to learn that his land could be more productive since there would be a lot more subsidies for farming since the oil revenues of the country would again be in the hands of the State.
If it is the second possibility, the farmer most likely would feel relieved altogether since subsidies to labor power and farming would mean greater income and better living conditions for him and his family.
C tthats what i would put for my answer
