Answer:
Demosthenes is your answer I believe.
Explanation:
IAnswer:
Im not sure how well this use of the information will help you but,
Source: "<em>In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy proclaimed an embargo on trade between the United States and Cuba, in response to certain actions taken by the Cuban government and directed the Department of Commerce and the Treasury to implement the embargo, which remains in place today. In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy proclaimed an embargo on trade between the United States and Cuba, in response to certain actions taken by the Cuban Government, and directed the Departments of Commerce and the Treasury to implement the embargo, which remains in place today. Beyond criticisms of human rights in Cuba, the United States holds $6 billion worth of financial claims against the Cuban government. The pro-embargo position is that the U.S. embargo is, in part, an appropriate response to these unaddressed claims."</em>
Paraphrasing - In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy announced an Associate in Nursing embargo on trade between U. S. and Cuba, in response to sure actions taken by the Cuban government, and directed the Department of Commerce and therefore the Treasury to implement the embargo. In February 1962, President John F. Kennedy announced an Associate in Nursing embargo on trade between u. s. and Cuba, in response to sure actions taken by the Cuban government, and directed the Department of Commerce and therefore the Treasury to implement the embargo, that remains in situ these days. on the far side of criticisms of human rights in Cuba, the U.S. holds a $6 billion value of economic claims against the Cuban government. The pro-embargo position is that the U.S. embargo is, in part, Associate in Nursing applicable response to those unaddressed claims.
Explanation:
The "source" is the information where i got it from and the "paraphrased" part is fully rewritten, ps sorry if it's a bit long and wordy! hope this helps have a great day :)
People revolted
People wanted to leave the country but couldn't.
Every day, the US Congress makes thousands of decisions.
In a direct Democracy, the citizenry would need to all be involved in each of these decisions. There are so many, that it would basically turn into a full time job for all citizens.
So, to allow for the majority of people to engage in trade or commerce, indirect democracy allows the election of representatives who act on behalf of the citizenry.
