Answer:
In his “I Have a Dream” speech, minister and civil rights activist Martin Luther King Jr. outlines the long history of racial injustice in America and encourages his audience to hold their country accountable to its own founding promises of freedom, justice, and equality. The main idea behind Martin Luther King's famous speech was to showcase to the American public the degree of racial inequality in the United States, requesting them to abstain from discriminating on the basis of race. It is recognized as one of the best speeches ever given. His wish was that people of different races could live together peacefully in the United States.
Explanation:
Facts:
In his speech, he spoke of his wish for the future. His wish was that people of different races could live together peacefully in the United States. The speech was given to over 200,000 supporters. He spoke of the discrimination that the black men have faced even though they were to be treated as equals after the great Abraham Lincoln signed the momentous decree; the Emancipation Proclamation. The speech is very famous. It has been called by many- the best speech given in the 20th century.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the one having to do with states rights being subject to the Constitution, since in the US the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. </span></span>
The <span>"necessary and proper" clause of Article I, Section 8, of the United States Constitution.
After enumerating a number of the powers of Congress, including borrowing money, coining money, regulating commerce, etc, Section 8 of Article I closes with by saying Congress shall have power "t</span><span>o make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."
The statement of the Marshall court in regard to the chartering of a national bank held significance beyond that issue as well. The ruling said: "L</span><span>et the ends be legitimate, let it be within the scope of the Constitution, and all means which are appropriate, which are plainly adopted to that end, which are not prohibited, but consist with the letter and spirit of the Constitution, are constitutional."</span>
