Answer:
D.
Explanation:
Franklin Delano Roosevelt was the 32nd President of the United States. He successfully led America through the Great Depression and World War II. Franklin was diagnosed with infantile paralysis in 1921 when he was 39 years old.
Despite being physically crippled, he reinforced America with confidence and strength.
The historian James Tobin, in his interview, once said that Roosevelt, though was crippled but this disability helped him to gain strength and confidence.<u> His struggle to overcome his affliction was the most important contribution in the development of his confidence and strength</u>.
So, the correct answer is option D.
A lot of people consider it the last year of ancient history and the beginning of the Middle Ages in Europe. It contributed to building the modern world we have today.
A person who knows that he is hostile and aloof is said to have declarative knowledge.
Knowledge is defined as something learned, understood, or conscious. One example of knowledge is learning the alphabet. One example of knowledge is the ability to find places. One example of knowledge is remembering details about an event.
Knowledge is the understanding and perception of something. It refers to information, facts, skills and wisdom acquired through learning and experience in life. Knowledge is a very broad concept and it has no end. Knowledge acquisition involves cognitive processes, communication, perception, and logic.
Knowledge is the perception or familiarity gained through experience of facts or situations, or through theoretical and practical understanding of a subject.
Learn more about knowledge here:brainly.com/question/9290109
#SPJ4
Many people talk about academic excellence — but who or what really defines this elusive quality?
Michèle Lamont, Robert I. Goldman Professor of European Studies and professor of sociology and of African and African American studies, analyzes the system of peer review in her new book “How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment” (Harvard University Press, 2009). By examining the process of scholarly evaluation, she also addresses larger questions about academia.
“In some ways studying peer evaluation and review is a point of entry into a much broader issue, which is the issue of meritocracy in American higher education,” says Lamont.
To research the book, Lamont interviewed panelists from research councils and societies of fellows who were evaluating proposals for research funding in the social sciences and the humanities.
Lamont explains that academics must constantly make evaluations, whether of scientific findings or of graduate students. Expertise, personal taste, and the perspective of the evaluator play into the decision-making process, she writes.
“A lot of what the book does is to look at what criteria people use to judge and what meaning they give to these criteria,” says Lamont. “So for instance, what do they mean by ‘significance’ and what do they mean by ‘originality’? How does the definition of ‘originality’ and ‘significance’ vary between philosophy and economics? How strong is the consensus between fields?
Answer:
b, c, e
Explanation:
Choose all that apply.
a. A baseball flying through the air,
b. A swan flapping its wings against air to gain altitude for flight,
c. A rocket lift off due to gases exiting from exhaust,
d. A ball being dropped from the roof of a building,
e. The air rushing out of a balloon causing it to move across the room,
f. Going forward in your seat after the brakes are quickly applied in the car
