Answer:
The conclusion about Pau Amma that this excerpt support is that "he thinks he is better than other animals".
Just took it! Unfold, Open up! Hope it helped (should be D)
Answer:
Adidas: "Impossible is Nothing."
Walmart: "Save Money. Live Better."
L'Oreal: "Because you’re worth it."
McDonald’s: "I’m Lovin’ It."
LG: "Life’s Good."
Panasonic: "Ideas for Life."
Mastercard: "There are some things money can’t buy. For everything else, there’s MasterCard."
Kentucky Fried Chicken: "Finger lickin’ good."
Sony: "Make Believe."
Kodak: "Share moments. Share life."
I would say the correct answer is choice D, but I'm not 100% sure.
hope this helps you! :-)
Answer: Yes, If punishments were harsh enough, there would probably be no crime.
Explanation: If people who disobeyed the law were strongly punished, then it would be less likely that people would break the rules of the government. Less people would speed, and more people would probably start being more serious about it. For example, crimes like bank robberies would probably become less likely if they had to pay off all of the money they stole. Being punished for certain things could be harsher. If this happens, the amount of crime will probably decrease, but it will not completely disappear. This is why I think If punishments were harsh enough, there would be no crime.
