Answer: How did the Soviet Union respond to the Hungarian independence movement in 1956?
The Soviets did so, but Nagy then tried to push the Hungarian revolt forward by abolishing one-party rule. He also announced that Hungary was withdrawing from the Warsaw Pact (the Soviet bloc's equivalent of NATO). On November 4, 1956, Soviet tanks rolled into Budapest to crush, once and for all, the national uprising. Between 4 and 8 November 1956, Nikita S. Khrushchev ordered the Red Army to put down the Hungarian Uprising by force. Soviet troops attacked en masse and abolished the independent national government. Hungary was immediately subjected to merciless repression, and hundreds of thousands of Hungarians fled to the West.Khrushchev refused to accept Hungary leaving the Warsaw Pact as it would leave a gap in the USSR's buffer zone with Western Europe. Thousands of Soviet tanks and soldiers entered Hungary to crackdown on the protests.Why was there opposition to Soviet control in Hungary 1956?
In 1956 the people of Hungary began to protest about their lack of basic political freedoms, e.g. to vote, or free speech. They also were angry at fuel shortages and poor harvests – nothing makes people more likely to riot against the government than if they are cold and hungry! initially anarchic, during the Hungarian Uprising the Hungarian people culminated in protests against domestic policies imposed by the USSR, and the people formed together in protest against the Soviet Union. The Hungarian flag with the Communist coat of arms (1948–56) cut out was a revolutionary symbol.
Darwin believed that animals compete for such things as food and water with other species and within their own species and the varieties that are most capable to do this successfully were naturally selected and eventually formed new species and that this mechanism explains the origin of species. Marx believed that social classes compete with each other ie the working class with the bourgeoisie with each trying to fulfil their needs the bourgeoisie for maximum profits and the working class for better wages and working conditions and eventually for the fruits of their labour to be used for socially useful purposes not just to enrich a few at the expense of the many so this is a revolutionary process.
Class rankings. Much of India live in poverty-something it is well known for. I think the impact of money distribution has had an impact on these peoples lives more than religion could ever effect them. Along with loss of money, the quality of life also disappears: diet, physical condition as well as mental health. Having less money will also affect your social life. The wealthier people may not socialise with the poor as much giving the class of everyone very clear. Religion has also had a clear impact on India, however I belive that the fact that some people can live in endless heaps of money, and some live in second to nothing, and are constantly reminded.of this because of their 'class'. I think this is more important.
