First, Zinn makes it clear that Columbus and his Spanish backers were motivated primarily by a desire to discover new sources of wealth. This explains their approach to dealing with the native peoples they encountered. As Zinn says, “The information that Columbus wanted most [from the natives] was: ‘Where is the gold?'” The second point would be his description of the effects of the policies of Columbus and the Spanish officials that followed him to the Caribbean. They led to the almost total extermination of the native peoples who inhabited the region. The famous account by Bartolome de Las Casas is cited to make this point all the more clear. The final three points are really related to historiography, and the uses of the past, and serve to set up the main thrust of Zinn’s overall narrative. First he shows that previous historians of Columbus’s actions in the New World such as Samuel Eliot Morison have effaced the unflattering parts, and that this has been deliberate: “the historian’s distortion…is ideological; it is released into a world of contending interests, where any chosen emphasis supports…some kind of interest.” This leads to his next point, which is that the “quiet acceptance of conquest and murder in the name of progress” has disturbing effects in our own time, making it easier for us to countenance the bad things people do with power today. Finally, Zinn argues that the whitewashing of history and celebration of the actions of men like Columbus is part of a larger historical approach that is told from the “point of view of governments, conquerors, diplomats,” and other powerful men. Zinn proposes a different approach, one which he will pursue in A People’s History, that focuses on people from the “bottom up.” So the aim of his treatment of Columbus is as much to set up his overall narrative approach as to tell an unimportant, or unfamiliar story about the man.
Zinn wrote that, "we must not accept the memory of states as our own. Nations are not communities and never have been." Also, he writes, "I don't want to romanticize them." He says he's blunt about the history and doesn't act like, for example, Columbus killed a bunch of people, but, oh, he was a hero! And, "I don't want to invent victories for people's movements."
Answer: The U.S. Senate determines the budget of the U.S. judiciary.
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that a lobbying group interested in shaping the federal judiciary spends large amounts of money on the Senate races in the U.S.
Out or the options given, the correct option will be because the U.S. Senate determines the budget of the U.S. judiciary. Th judiciary is in charge of interpreting the law.
Since the budget is determined by the U.S senate, this will be the reason for the lobbying group spending large amounts of money on U.S. Senate races.
Social structure is the stable pattern of social relationships that exist within a particular group or society. It provides a framework within which we interact with others. It is an orderly, Fixed arrangement of parts that together make up <span>the whole group or society.</span>
Answer:
Meztizo
Explanation:
Meztizo is a ethnic group in Spain. I think it is the answer.
Answer: To match the lipsing with the backstage voice artist.
Explanation:
The actor or actress working on state may not use their voice, while acting instead backstage people give voice to them. This occurs because the actress or actor at the stage may not give be attentive towards dialogue delivery or may forget the dialogues in public fear. Thus, it is advised that the actor or actress learn the script thoroughly and should not use own vocabulary or script during dialogue delivery. As it will not match with the voice recording of the actor or actress or with people working at backstage.
