Considering the situation, and based on the laws end regulation codes established by the United States Department of Health and Human Services, IRB has the authority to approve research involving pregnant women.
IRB, an acronym for Institutional review board, under Subpart B, Section 46.203, stated that IRB has the jurisdiction to determine whether to approve research involving a pregnant woman.
Also, under Section 46.204, subsection D., IRB can approve this case whereby a research study is greater than minimal risk with no potential direct benefit to subjects. The study includes pregnant women.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is, Yes, IRB can approve such research.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/8905808
Answer:
On the basis of the law of the state where the accident occurred
Explanation:
In a federal court, a case involving an automobile accident would be decided on the basis of <u>the state where the accident occurred</u>
The laws of the state where the accident happened will be pivotal in the courts decision in the federal court.
I believe the answer is: <span>Thought stopping
</span><span>Thought stopping refers to a therapy technique that is aimed to remove problematic thought that might be the source of the patient's psychological problem.
In the scenario above, this problematic thought came from the falsehood which make bella believed she would always got laughed at and causing the anxiety problem toward her</span>
The statement above was done during the conscription in the civil war.
<h3>The American civil war</h3>
The civil war was fought between the Northern Union army and the Southern confederates of the United States.
The reason for the war was due to the fact that the south had refused the abolishment of slavery in their region. Instead they threatened to secede.
Read more on the civil war here:
brainly.com/question/24992590