Answer:
Effective follower
Explanation:
An Effective follower is employee in a business who often go to leadership positions, who are always motivated and keen to take responsibility and who exceeds expectations and achieves business goals just like Sarah
I think now I’m present day that money is now being transferred online and email services I think cash for no longer be used in the future because the rise of technology and how everyone is now getting so used to it and depending on tech
It would be positive it would be more clear to people and for the younger generation to learn about but for the older generation it would be much harder and would be a negative affect on them since they didn’t use technology in their days and a lot of people are still used to cash
Answer:
To mitigate damages
Explanation:
When a a tenant breaches the terms of a real estate agreement, the landlord must come in to get another tenant to occupy the space.
He is avoiding a situation where the property is to be left unoccupied for a period of time.
Mitigating damages is a way of reducing further loss when one party breaches a contract.
In the given scenario if a tenant moves out of leased premises before the term of the lease expires, the landlord is required to make a reasonable attempt to lease the property to another party.
In this instance, Xavier and Shawn are general partners. In this arrangement, all partners are equally responsible for the business, meaning they are both liable for any financial loss. LLC would protect their personal assets from this type of claim. Obviously, this isn't a sole proprietorship because there is more than one owner.
Answer:
The correct answer would be option B, Judge's own personal feelings about the internet.
Explanation:
When a case comes to a court, it is the responsibility of a judge to see every aspect of the case and analyze it on the basis of given evidence or set rules or standards, or in the light of decisions made on the same case by other courts. But in this question, it is said that the case which was brought to the court was the first in its kind, it means no such type of case has been ever submitted in any court before. The freedom of speech on internet is a sensitive issue. So all aspects should be kept in mind while proceeding the case, and it would not be considered proper for the judge to bring his person feelings about the internet into the case. His personal feelings should be set aside and the case should be solved on the basis of evidences and solid views.
