Answer:
1) d. $175,000
2) b. $156,250
Explanation:
1. The computation of net income for 20X9 under the treasury stock method is shown below:-
Net income for 20X9 under the treasury stock method = Janet Operating income + Slider operating income
= $100,000 + $75,000
= $175,000
2. The computation of income assigned to the controlling interest for 20X9 is shown below:-
income assigned to the controlling interest for 20X9 = Janet Operating income + (Slider operating income × Remaining percentage)
= $100,000 + ($75,000 × 75%)
= $100,000 + $56,250
= $156,250
Therefore we have applied the above formulas.
Answer:
B) The Law of Demand
Explanation:
The correlation between the volume demanded, and the price of a good is explained by demand law. As per this law, price and the quantity demanded have an indirect or inverse relationship. An increase or decrease in price results in quantity demanded moving in the opposite direction.
Should the prices of a product or service increase, its demand falls.
Answer:
hi i reallly tried but dont want to give an answer that is wrong
plz forgive me
god bless u
Explanation:
1. Accept “no” for an answer.
2. Be direct and straightforward.
3. Avoid guilt.
4. Be direct and polite.
5. Don’t cross the line, avoid “asking too much”.
Answer:
Please check the answer below
Explanation:
a. One issue is the "locking-in" of assets. If I hold shares of Corporation X, then I can delay paying taxes as long as I don't sell. Effectively, I get to keep all of the interest/dividend payments on my tax liability. However, if I discover that X is really a poor investment and Corporation Y is better, then selling X and buying Y means that I have to pay taxes. This might discourage me from making a switch to a more profitable/efficient investment decision. This is the "locking-in" effect.
b. A short-run cut might cause many people to sell stocks that they had felt "locked-in" with. The penalty for switching is smaller, so more people will do it -- resulting in a great deal of cap gains tax revenue collected.
c. Taxing realized gains, even when the stock is not sold, rather than just accrued gains would eliminate this locking-in effect. Investors would not be penalized for switching to a better investment, and long-term capital gains revenue (as well as efficiency) would rise.
