The two direct results of the issues presented by Eisenhower in his speech are the creation of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and the passage of the National Defense Education Act. Hence, Options 1 and 2 are the correct statements.
<h3>Who was
Eisenhower?</h3>
Dwight David "Ike" Eisenhower turned into an American navy officer and statesman who served as the thirty-fourth president of the USA from 1953 to 1961.
He served as Supreme Commander of the Allied Expeditionary Force in Europe and accomplished the five-star rank of General of the Army, during World War II.
The complete information about the question is given below:
What were two direct results of the issues presented by Eisenhower in his speech?
1) the creation of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
2) the passage of the National Defense Education Act
3) the passage of the Taft-Hartley Act
4) the creation of the House Un-American Activities Committee
Hence, Options A and B are the correct statements.
learn more about Eisenhower:
brainly.com/question/1262961
#SPJ1
If I remember correctly, it showed the French that the colonies had a chance of winning the war.
"<span>a.The flurry of investing artificially raised the price of stocks" would be the best option, since this investing led to companies being incredibly over-priced, which led to the financial "bubble" that burst in the Crash of 1929. </span>
Galileo revolutionized the field of astronomy through the destruction or rather debunking of the Ptolemaic concept of the universe. He also was the one who showed that there were multiple moons (4 to be exact) revolving around Jupiter and that there were sunspots. All of this dramatically changed astronomy in the future.
Answer:
The Arizona v. United States decision struck down all Arizona's most restrictive provisions on illegal immigration.
Explanation:
Federalism is a form of government that stands in direct opposition to the notion of centralism, that is, to the form of political organization of states in which power appears centralized in the hands of a single governing group. Federalism, for its part, allows power (and the freedom to make decisions) to be distributed independently to the federal, state, and local government.
Under federalism, the rules governing immigration matters are different for the federal government, the state government, and the place where one can set their own guidelines for this. With regard to immigration, we can say that since the 1990s, states have increasingly adopted the political domain of immigration, and state involvement in immigration is partly due to their interest in preventing illegal immigrants from accessing public services, as educational and welfare benefits. In addition, we can state that federal immigration laws outperform state laws.
False information about immigration federalism is: "Arizona's decision against the United States overturned all of Arizona's most restrictive provisions on illegal immigration."
