Answer:
5 triangles maybe?
Step-by-step explanation:
9514 1404 393
Answer:
24 m
Step-by-step explanation:
The area formula tells us ...
22 = xy . . . . . square meters
Adding twice this to the quadratic constraint gives ...
(x^2 +y^2) +2(xy) = (100) +2(22)
(x +y)^2 = 144
x +y = √144 = 12
The perimeter is double this amount, so is ...
P = 2(x +y) = 2(12) = 24 . . . . meters
2 times 8 x 12
192
2 times 5 x 8
80
2 times 12 x 5
60
192+80+60=332 ft^2
Answer: option <span>D) y=x, x-axis, y=x, y-axis</span>.
I first thought it was the option C) and I tried with it but it was wrong. This is how I dit it.
Option C step by step:
<span>1) Reflection over the x - axis => point with coordinates (a,b) is transformed into point with coordinates (a, -b)
2) Reflection over the line y = x => point with coordinates (a, -b) is transformed into point with coordinates (-b,a)
3) New feflection over the x - axis => (-b,a) transforms into (-b, -a)
4) New reflection over the line y = x => (-b,-a) transforms into (-a,-b)
Which shows it is not the option C).
Then I probed with option D. Step by step:
1) Reflection over the line y = x => (a,b) → (b,a)
2) Reflection over the x-axis => (b,a) → (b,-a)
3) Reflection over the line y = x => (b,-a) → (-a,b)
4) Reflection over the y-axis => (-a,b) → (a,b).
So, this set of reflections, given by the option D) transforms any point into itself, which proofs that the option D) is the right answer.
</span>
