The reason is that we have a decision to assume liability
and responsibility of our well-being, yet there are communities which don't have
the assets to do as such.
Accomplishing healthy conduct isn't every time conceivable
in specific spots or for a lot many families. Social determinants hinder the singular
responsibility.
Answer:
true
Statements:
-Thinking like a sociologist means making the familiar strange.
-Sociologists seek to uncover cause-and-effect relationships.
Explanation:
Sociologists study how language, media and stereotypes are formed as product of historical, contextual and changing social process.
Often this means making something very familiar, to be questioned and then profoundly:<u> for example we ask why people and social groups act in a certain way.</u>
<em>Even if we think that it is out of common sense, many social actions have a higher cause and impact , that is why Sociology makes unlying causes and effect also a subject of debate.</em>
We can see that many everyday actions are random actions but for sociogy , many social actions have a widened scope and are explained in terms of the effects and the cause that underlies.
<u>This is why social science will concern with the concept of causality, in which an action or event will be produced in a certain response to the action in the form of another event.</u>
I believe the answer is D) passing laws because since they were slaves they would not have the right to have any laws passed or their opinion even heard
According to Van Hayek, Galbraith's claims that people do not want other things beside food,clothes, and shelters is illogical.
The people with more income to spend tend to have more tertiary needs that is outside these 3 categories.<span />
It is the concrete operational stage as far as I know.
