All categories

3 years ago

How did religion affect/lead to the spread of Indian empires in 600bce-600ce?

1 answer:

N76 [4]3 years ago

5 0

Buddhism led to the spread of Indian empires because for the first time in Indian history, India had a common ground to unite under and this led to India becoming stronger as a nation. India was able to have most of its architectural feats that are now renowned during this time because of religion.

You might be interested in

Do you think the representations in the media of the identification and analysis of physical evidence are accurate based on the

Fofino [41]

Yes
Because of the analysis the identification is possible for the mechanical reaction based on the lesson I think it is physically and mentally possible

4 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A business's net income is defined as

Kipish [7]

Total income after expenses

5 0

3 years ago

Which of these statements about the world's food supply is most accurate?

Roman55 [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

because it seems to be the most accurate

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

- How did psychology’s ground breakers move psychology forward and help advance gender and race equality?

LenKa [72]

Question:

How did psychology’s ground breakers move psychology forward and help advance gender and race equality?

Answer:-

When the human sciences sorted themselves out in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, psychology gradually extended its scope to include everything about human beings as individuals, adding the studies of individual behavior and individual differences to the study of consciousness. It helped in advancing the gender differences between man and woman.

Liberality and Fraternity came into existence. Equal rights were given to both men and women, including children. This helped in giving a respectful behaviour and tolerance which wasn't present before.

Answered by Benjemin

6 0

3 years ago

A psychologist conducted a study at her home during an annual activity of children wearing masks and going door-to-door receivin

klasskru [66]

Graph is attached.

Answer:

a) The number of children who took extra candy can be said to be the operational definition of the dependent variable here.

(The dependent variable is defined as the variable that is tested by the experimenter. The outcome of dependent variable depends on the independent variable).

b) The psychologist hypotheses are :

H1 : The children would take more candy when they were alone.

H2: The children would take more candy when they were masked.

The data does not in anyway support the hypothesis 1 of the psychologist because from the graph the percentage of children who took candy when alone was low.

The data fully supports the hypothesis 2. From the graph we could denote the percentage of children who colected additional candy when masked was higher.

c) The findings cannot be generalized to all children because only children from the psychologist's neighborhood was used in the experiment.

d) This study is not a naturalistic behaviour because the psychologist is manipulating a variable. Therefore we cannot call this study a naturalistic behaviour.

e) Modeling: Here the children's behaviour may be influenced because they may try to imitate what other children did. A child may take additional candy because another chid took additional candy.

Deindividuation: In this case, the children may feel a loss of identity or anonymous because they are in group. They may take extra candy because they feel anonymous.

From the graph, we could see the percentage of children in group who took extra candy was higher than the percentage of chidren alone who took extra candy.

Lawrence Kohlberg’s preconventional stage: A child's behaviour may be influenced by his self interest to gain reward. This may make the child not collect extra candy.

This Lawrence Kohlberg’s preconventional stage may also influence the behaviour of the children as the children may also be afraid of punishment, which may result in them not collecting extra candy

6 0

3 years ago