<span>Since a peasant owns little property and works in the employ of a landowner or business owner, he or she would have little concern for the loss of property and be less concerned if the flow of products is disrupted. He or she would also have more incentive to invest in a revolution that upended the status quo and allowed for more mobility within the social and economic hierarchies. The merchant would be invested in quelling any rebellion that would interrupt the economy and cause destruction of property and good.</span>
The three possible ways we could attempt an interpretation of the finding are listed below.
1. Society as a whole has failed its adolescents by not ensuring that they are brought up in healthy homes.
2. Parents have not created healthy homes for their children. Childbearing comes with a set of responsibilities on those who engage in the activity.
3. It is imperative to ensure that adolescents receive adequate love and understanding in healthy homes so that they may behave healthily.
Thus, since one cannot give what she or he does not have, society must ensure that we have healthy homes for the growth of adolescents and the nurturing of healthy habits.
Read more about adolescents and unhealthy behaviors at brainly.com/question/4636652
A city's population density would decrease (most likely) due to the fact that people would most likely spread out.
