Answer:
We don't have the document's
Explanation:
None of these conclusions is valid.
- The first one implies that people either think that their employer should cover part of the health insurance costs (as said in the original sentence), or they think that the employer should pay 100%. This is not correct because there are other possible opinions people can have, like thinking that the employer shouldn't pay for anything, for example.
- The second conclusion is invalid for the same reason: it implies that people can only either think that the employer should pay a large part, or that the employer shouldn't pay anything. It is not considering other options.
- The third conclusion does not work either because it is referring to what people think about <em>the amount </em>of the costs themselves, whereas the original topic was <em>how</em> they are paid for.
As of 2009, Sunni Muslims constituted 87–90% of the world's Muslim population-
the Shia believe that leader is called an imam and this "caliph/imam" should be a direct descendant of Mohammed-
and I have no clue on the last one
<span>Ancient Greek democracy had a deep influence on the design of political institutions in the United States. The various members of the founding generation of the United States saw ancient Athens the cradle of Greek democracy as both an inspirational model and also as an example of dangerous excess. </span>
