Hello. Your question is incomplete and this makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, in the context of your question, we can assume that you are referring to John Marshall's decision regarding the Marbury v. Madison. If that is the case, I hope the answer below can help you.
Answer and Explanation:
In the case of Marbury v. Madison, John Marshall decided that the national congress does not have absolute power over government decisions, as, like the entire political body in the country, it was subject to the laws covered by the federal constitution. Thus, any act, adopted by Congress, or any other branch of government, that was unconstitutional, that is, that was not approved by any law within the federal constitution, could be revised or completely annulled by the Supreme Court.
What prompted Marshall to decide this was the positioning of the federal constitution as the country's supreme law, which cannot be violated in any way.
The Marbury case v. Madison, occurred when William Marbury, who was appointed as country judge by President John Adams, did not receive the diploma that allowed him to hold office, when James Madison became Secretary of State after President Thomas Jefferson came to power. However, as an appointed judge, Marbury had the right to receive the diploma and Marshall saw the denial of the diploma as an unconstitutional act.
. True Indio European language
Answer:
nearly fail?
Explanation:
Famine, disease and conflict with local Native American tribes in the first two years broughtJamestown to the brink of failure before the arrival of a new group of settlers and supplies in 1610.
Every animal that eats is a consumer. and every plant is a producer. In these chains, the first two pictures are consumers because they are eating something to survive; it could be another animal or a plant. the last thing in the chain are all plants ( producers).
In Okami, Genetics is by all accounts a predominant reason for schizophrenia, it is presently certain that a few arrangements of qualities are in making a man be helpless against creating schizophrenia. There have been various examinations to demonstrate that a man with a relative with the turmoil has a more serious hazard. That is whether they are nearly hereditarily related. It could likewise need to manage an unevenness of dopamine may cause the turmoil. Neither nature nor support alone is in charge of the mind chem and improvement. Other than qualities, nature in which the individual is in or experienced childhood in can affect. A man who is has both a hereditary defenselessness to the turmoil and have introduction under specific conditions that add to the beginning of the sickness is known as a diathesis-push show.
