Answer: True
Explanation:
Profiling involves gathering information about an individual based on psychological and behavioural features in order to have a check or predict what the person could likely do or become under certain conditions atmosphere or company. It is used to check the criminal record of an individual or the likelihood of exhibiting certain criminal behaviour.
Profiling is legal and can be carried out by law enforcement officers, such checks includes identity checks, stop and search, border control, etc. It becomes illegal if it is done to discriminate against race, religion, sex, national origin and ethnic group. On such grounds it becomes illegal in the US, Europe and even under the international law.
Answer:
It is referred to as economic geography.
Explanation:
Economic geography is a study of human's economic activities under varios conditions and is oftenassociated with production, location, distribution, consumption, exchange of resources, and spatial organization of economic activities across the world.
By comparing these economist canunderstand the structure of the area's economy and its economic relationship with other areas around the world.
Answer: D
Explanation: it’s obvious tress give off oxygen!
Answer: a cupcake taste like a cake.its so delicous and sweet.its awesome.icing on it makes it even bette
Explanation:
One particular organization that fought for racial equality was the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) founded in 1909. For about the first 20 years of its existence, it tried to persuade Congress and other legislative bodies to enact laws that would protect African Americans from lynchings and other racist actions. Beginning in the 1930s, though, the NAACP's Legal Defense and Education Fund began to turn to the courts to try to make progress in overcoming legally sanctioned discrimination. From 1935 to 1938, the legal arm of the NAACP was headed by Charles Hamilton Houston. Houston, together with Thurgood Marshall, devised a strategy to attack Jim Crow laws by striking at them where they were perhaps weakest—in the field of education. Although Marshall played a crucial role in all of the cases listed below, Houston was the head of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund while Murray v. Maryland and Missouri ex rel Gaines v. Canada were decided. After Houston returned to private practice in 1938, Marshall became head of the Fund and used it to argue the cases of Sweat v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma Board of Regents of Higher Education.
