1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vaieri [72.5K]
3 years ago
14

Contributions made by the Greeks include: (Check all that apply).

History
2 answers:
Eduardwww [97]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The Greeks made contributions to

latin language

democracy,

architecture,

states medicince,

and intellectual thinking

Explanation:

kakasveta [241]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:medicine, democracy,architecture,aqueducts,bridges,science discoveries,intellectuall thinking,laws

Explanation:

You might be interested in
40 POINTS! PLEASE HELP!!
laiz [17]

number one is c(thats what google said) and the second i think is the third one off of a movie i saw called the gangs of new york

5 0
2 years ago
Was the Declaration of Independence intended to be a formal declaration of war? Why or why not?
Gnesinka [82]
No, <span> the Declaration of Independence was intended to</span> explain to foreign nations why the colonies had chosen to separate themselves from Great Britain. The Revolutionary War had already begun, and several major battles had already taken place.
7 0
3 years ago
In the United States, what role does the government play in the economic system?
mixer [17]
The government plays the role of promoting economic growth and stability of a country. It does this by providing legal and policy frameworks, a stable environment for business and investing in manpower and infrastructure. 

In short, the government enforces economic laws and regulations. 

Good luck :)
8 0
3 years ago
According to Gribkov, why was Zorin unable to answer Adalai Stevenson’s question about the missiles in Cuba
luda_lava [24]

Answer:

I want to say to you, Mr. Zorin, that I do not have your talent for obfuscation, for distortion, for confusing language, and for doubletalk. And I must confess to you that I am glad that I do not!

But if I understood what you said, you said that my position had changed, that today I was defensive because we did not have the evidence to prove our assertions, that your Government had installed long-range missiles in Cuba.

Well, let me say something to you, Mr. Ambassador—we do have the evidence. We have it, and it is clear and it is incontrovertible. And let me say something else—those weapons must be taken out of Cuba.

Next, let me say to you that, if I understood you, with a trespass on credibility that excels your best, you said that our position had changed since I spoke here the other day because of the pressures of world opinion and the majority of the United Nations. Well, let me say to you, sir, you are wrong again. We have had no pressure from anyone whatsoever. We came in here today to indicate our willingness to discuss Mr. U Thant’s proposals, and that is the only change that has taken place.

But let me also say to you, sir, that there has been a change. You—the Soviet Union has sent these weapons to Cuba. You—the Soviet Union has upset the balance of power in the world. You—the Soviet Union has created this new danger, not the United States.

And you ask with a fine show of indignation why the President did not tell Mr. Gromyko on last Thursday about our evidence, at the very time that Mr. Gromyko was blandly denying to the President that the U.S.S.R. was placing such weapons on sites in the new world.

Well, I will tell you why—because we were assembling the evidence, and perhaps it would be instructive to the world to see how a Soviet official—how far he would go in perfidy. Perhaps we wanted to know if this country faced another example of nuclear deceit like that one a year ago, when in stealth, the Soviet Union broke the nuclear test moratorium.

And while we are asking questions, let me ask you why your Government—your Foreign Minister—deliberately, cynically deceived us about the nuclear build-up in Cuba.

And, finally, the other day, Mr. Zorin, I remind you that you did not deny the existence of these weapons. Instead, we heard that they had suddenly become defensive weapons. But today again if I heard you correctly, you now say that they do not exist, or that we haven’t proved they exist, with another fine flood of rhetorical scorn.

All right, sir, let me ask you one simple question: Do you, Ambassador Zorin, deny that the U.S.S.R. has placed and is placing medium- and intermediate-range missiles and sites in Cuba? Yes or no—don’t wait for the translation—yes or no?

(The Soviet representative refused to answer.)

You can answer yes or no. You have denied they exist. I want to know if I understood you correctly. I am prepared to wait for my answer until hell freezes over, if that’s your decision. And I am also prepared to present the evidence in this room.

(The President called on the representative of Chile to speak, but Ambassador Stevenson continued as follows.)

I have not finished my statement. I asked you a question. I have had no reply to the question, and I will now proceed, if I may, to finish my statement.

I doubt if anyone in this room, except possibly the representative of the Soviet Union, has any doubt about the facts. But in view of his statements and the statements of the Soviet Government up until last Thursday, when Mr. Gromyko denied the existence or any intention of installing such weapons in Cuba, I am going to make a portion of the evidence available right now. If you will indulge me for a moment, we will set up an easel here in the back of the room where I hope it will be visible to everyone.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
11. Compare and contrast the views of the Federalist Party and the Democratic Republican Party
hammer [34]

Answer:

federalist supported the bank, they were typically pro-British in foreign policy, and wanted a loose interpretation of the Constitution and wanted a strong central government. the democratic republicans on the other hand opposed the national bank, were pro-french in foreign policy, and wanted a strict interpretation of the Constitution and a weak central government  

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • ArticalVI of the Constitution, which includes the supremacy clause, ensures that
    12·1 answer
  • Help me pleaseeee I don’t knowww!!!
    13·1 answer
  • Progressives knew that the best way to guarantee nationwide change was to: A. Amend the Constitution. B. Gain voting rights for
    14·2 answers
  • . What was significant about Reagan's Berlin Speech in 1987? It caused the East Germans to rebel against the East German governm
    11·1 answer
  • Someone can help me !?:(
    12·2 answers
  • The Philippines rely on fishing or what economic activity in their rural settlements
    5·1 answer
  • Where did power come from in Israel
    9·1 answer
  • Technology can help government handle economic emergencies,such as
    5·2 answers
  • CAN YOU PLEASE HELP ME !!
    8·2 answers
  • Do you agree that the Electoral College is still the most
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!