Answer:
The correct answer is - to expedite trade by finding and charting alternative methods of transport to Asia.
The Ottomans made a large empire, and they managed to gain control of the trade routes between Europe and Asia, demanding high taxes for both sides if they wanted to use their territory for trade. The Europeans did not fancy this, so they sponsored an expedition, one of many to come so that a new sea route is found for Asia, thus trading through it freely. Columbus was the main explorer of one of those missions. He went westwards with the ships he had at disposal, hoping that he will come to the eastern coast of Asia. He indeed came to some islands, and later a mainland, and all excited about it he called the natives Indians, as he actually thought it is India that he reached. Little did he knew that he actually discovered new continents.
Explanation:
Answer:
Industrial Revolution, in modern history, the process of change from an agrarian and handicraft economy to one dominated by industry and machine manufacturing. This process began in Britain in the 18th century and from there spread to other parts of the world. Although used earlier by French writers, the term Industrial Revolution was first popularized by the English economic historian Arnold Toynbee (1852–83) to describe Britain’s economic development from 1760 to 1840. Since Toynbee’s time the term has been more broadly applied.
Answer: Comanche and Apache territories are northwest
Explanation: They are these territories that are northwest which is something to do with the natives which includes them to be a tribe. The comanche were the only native americans more powerful than the apache. When they finally gained power , they made them move further west . They had to make peace with their enemies meaning no war just peace , they were more powerful than the other people.
Quebec Act, 1774. Quebec Act, 1774, passed by the British Parliament to institute a permanent administration in Canada replacing the temporary government created at the time of the Proclamation of 1763.
(i looked it up on google)
Answer:
There are no limitations on “human rights” because they do not exist in the natural world. If there were such things as “natural rights” there would be no need to define and enforce them since, being part of the natural world, they would require no human intervention.
Explanation:
I searched your question on the internet and the first thing I saw was that^^
